Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
the consideration of questions of such importance concerning the being
of the Son of God, we are lost in the deepest amazement that such a
nature, pre-eminent above all others, should have divested itself of its
condition of majesty and become man, and tabernacled amongst men, as the
grace that was poured upon His lips testifies, and as His heavenly
Father bore Him witness, and as is confessed by the various signs and
wonders and miracles[225] that were performed by Him; who also, before
that appearance of His which He manifested in the body, sent the
prophets as His forerunners, and the messengers of His advent; and after
His ascension into heaven, made His holy apostles, men ignorant and
unlearned, taken from the ranks of tax-gatherers or fishermen, but who
were filled with the power of His divinity, to itinerate throughout the
world, that they might gather together out of every race and every
nation a multitude of devout believers in Himself.
2. But of all the marvellous and mighty acts related of Him, this
altogether surpasses human admiration, and is beyond the power of mortal
frailness to understand or feel, how that mighty power of divine
majesty, that very Word of the Father, and that very wisdom of God, in
which were created all things, visible and invisible, can be believed to
have existed within the limits of that man who appeared in Judea; nay,
that the Wisdom of God can have entered the womb of a woman, and have
been born an infant, and have uttered wailings like the cries of little
children! And that afterwards it should be related that He was greatly
troubled in death, saying, as He Himself declared, “My soul is
sorrowful, even unto death;”[226] and that at the last He was brought to
that death which is accounted the most shameful among men, although He
rose again on the third day. Since, then, we see in Him some things so
human that they appear to differ in no respect from the common frailty
of mortals, and some things so divine that they can appropriately belong
to nothing else than to the primal and ineffable nature of Deity, the
narrowness of human understanding can find no outlet; but, overcome with
the amazement of a mighty admiration, knows not whither to withdraw, or
what to take hold of, or whither to turn. If it think of a God, it sees
a mortal; if it think of a man, it beholds Him returning from the grave,
after overthrowing the empire of death, laden with its spoils. And
therefore the spectacle is to be contemplated with all fear and
reverence, that the truth of both natures may be clearly shown to exist
in one and the same Being; so that nothing unworthy or unbecoming may be
perceived in that divine and ineffable substance, nor yet those things
which were done be supposed to be the illusions of imaginary
appearances. To utter these things in human ears, and to explain them in
words, far surpasses the powers either of our rank, or of our intellect
and language. I think that it surpasses the power even of the holy
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account