Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
apostles; nay, the explanation of that mystery may perhaps be beyond the
grasp of the entire creation of celestial powers. Regarding Him, then,
we shall state, in the fewest possible words, the contents of our creed
rather than the assertions which human reason is wont to advance; and
this from no spirit of rashness, but as called for by the nature of our
arrangement, laying before you rather [what may be termed] our
suspicions than any clear affirmations.
3. The Only-begotten of God, therefore, through whom, as the previous
course of the discussion has shown, all things were made, visible and
invisible, according to the view of Scripture, both made all things, and
loves what He made. For since He is Himself the invisible image of the
invisible God, He conveyed invisibly a share in Himself to all His
rational creatures, so that each one obtained a part of Him exactly
proportioned to the amount of affection with which he regarded Him. But
since, agreeably to the faculty of free-will, variety and diversity
characterized the individual souls, so that one was attached with a
warmer love to the Author of its being, and another with a feebler and
weaker regard, that soul (_anima_) regarding which Jesus said, “No one
shall take my life (_animam_) from me,”[227] inhering, from the
beginning of the creation, and afterwards, inseparably and indissolubly
in Him, as being the Wisdom and Word of God, and the Truth and the true
Light, and receiving Him wholly, and passing into His light and
splendour, was made with Him in a pre-eminent degree[228] one spirit,
according to the promise of the apostle to those who ought to imitate
it, that “he who is joined in the Lord is one spirit.”[229] This
substance of a soul, then, being intermediate between God and the
flesh—it being impossible for the nature of God to intermingle with a
body without an intermediate instrument—the God-man is born, as we have
said, that substance being the intermediary to whose nature it was not
contrary to assume a body. But neither, on the other hand, was it
opposed to the nature of that soul, as a rational existence, to receive
God, into whom, as stated above, as into the Word, and the Wisdom, and
the Truth, it had already wholly entered. And therefore deservedly is it
also called, along with the flesh which it had assumed, the Son of God,
and the Power of God, the Christ, and the Wisdom of God, either because
it was wholly in the Son of God, or because it received the Son of God
wholly into itself. And again, the Son of God, through whom all things
were created, is named Jesus Christ and the Son of man. For the Son of
God also is said to have died—in reference, viz., to that nature which
could admit of death; and He is called the Son of man, who is announced
as about to come in the glory of God the Father, with the holy angels.
And for this reason, throughout the whole of Scripture, not only is the
divine nature spoken of in human words, but the human nature is adorned
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account