The writings of Origen, Vol. 2 (of 2) — John Shaqi
The writings of Origen, Vol. 2 (of 2)Origen
Religion
The writings of Origen, Vol. 2 (of 2)
Origen
Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
terms a demon, and on his inability to save His followers from being put
to death—chap. xxxix. Contrast between the Christian and heathen
doctrine of punishment—chap. xl. Railing address of Celsus, to the
effect that although Christians may revile the statues of the gods, they
would not have reviled the gods themselves with impunity; that nothing
happened to those who crucified Jesus; that no father was ever so
inhuman as was the father of Jesus, etc. etc.: Answers—chaps. xli.-xliv.
Celsus asserts that it is of no use to collect all the oracular
responses that have been delivered, for the world is full of them, and
many remarkable events have happened in consequence of them, which
establish their reality and divinity; general remark in answer—chap.
xlv. Contrast between conduct of Pythian priestess, who frequently
allowed herself to be bribed, and that of the prophets, who were admired
for their downright truthfulness—chap. xlvi. Assertion of Greeks, that
the Jewish history contains fabulous accounts, refuted—chap. xlvii.
Endeavour of Celsus to show that the doctrines delivered at the
celebration of the pagan mysteries are the same as those of the
Christians; absurdity of this—chap. xlviii. Celsus reproaches Christians
with inconsistency in their treatment of the body: Answer—chaps. xlix.,
l. Celsus approves the Christian doctrine that the righteous shall enjoy
everlasting life, and the wicked shall suffer everlasting punishment;
inconsistency of this on the part of Celsus—chap. li. Anxiety of Origen
to bring all men to receive the whole system of Christian truth—chap.
lii. Doubtful manner in which Celsus speaks of certain weighty matters,
and reluctance on his part to set down any of them as false;
inconsistency of this with the manner in which he treats the doctrines
of Christianity, which he regards with a hostile spirit—chaps. liii.,
liv. Celsus asserts that Christians must make their choice between two
alternatives; nature of these: Answer—chaps. lv.-lvii. Seeks to degrade
the souls of men to the worship of demons, by referring to certain
practices and beliefs prevalent among the Egyptians: Answer—chaps.
lviii.-lix. Admits that there is a dangerous tendency in demon-worship:
Remarks—chaps. lx.-lxii. Yet adds that the more just opinion is that
demons desire and need nothing, but that they take pleasure in those who
discharge towards them offices of piety: Answer—chaps. lxiii.-lxv.
Celsus admits that no worshipper of God should submit to anything base,
but should encounter any torments or death, rather than do anything
unworthy of God; and yet to celebrate the sun, or the praises of
Minerva, is only to render higher praise to God; inconsistency of
this—chaps. lxvi., lxvii. Maintains that the Homeric saying must be
observed, “Let one be king, whom the son of crafty Saturn appointed;”
sense in which this must be understood by Christians—chap. lxviii.
Inconsistency on the part of Celsus, after what he has said, in asking
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account