Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
Footnote 41:
Gal. iv. 21, 22.
Footnote 42:
1 Cor. ix. 8.
Chapter IV.
The Jew, then, continues his address to converts from his own nation
thus: “Yesterday and the day before, when we visited with punishment the
man who deluded you, ye became apostates from the law of your fathers;”
showing by such statements (as we have just demonstrated) anything but
an exact knowledge of the truth. But what he advances afterwards seems
to have some force, when he says: “How is it that you take the beginning
of your system from our worship, and when you have made some progress
you treat it with disrespect, although you have no other foundation to
show for your doctrines than our law?” Now, certainly the introduction
to Christianity is through the Mosaic worship and the prophetic
writings; and after the introduction, it is in the interpretation and
explanation of these that progress takes place, while those who are
introduced prosecute their investigations into “the mystery according to
revelation, which was kept secret since the world began, but now is made
manifest in the Scriptures of the prophets,”[43] and by the appearance
of our Lord Jesus Christ. But they who advance in the knowledge of
Christianity do not, as ye allege, treat the things written in the law
with disrespect. On the contrary, they bestow upon them greater honour,
showing what a depth of wise and mysterious reasons is contained in
these writings, which are not fully comprehended by the Jews, who treat
them superficially, and as if they were in some degree even
fabulous.[44] And what absurdity should there be in our system—that is,
the gospel—having the law for its foundation, when even the Lord Jesus
Himself said to those who would not believe upon Him: “If ye had
believed Moses, ye would have believed me, for he wrote of me. But if ye
do not believe his writings, how shall ye believe my words?”[45] Nay,
even one of the evangelists—Mark—says: “The beginning of the gospel of
Jesus Christ, as it is written in the prophet Isaiah, Behold, I send my
messenger before Thy face, who shall prepare Thy way before Thee,”[46]
which shows that the beginning of the gospel is connected with the
Jewish writings. What force, then, is there in the objection of the Jew
of Celsus, that “if any one predicted to us that the Son of God was to
visit mankind, he was one of our prophets, and the prophet of our God?”
Or how is it a charge against Christianity, that John, who baptized
Jesus, was a Jew? For although He was a Jew, it does not follow that
every believer, whether a convert from heathenism or from Judaism, must
yield a literal obedience to the law of Moses.
Footnote 43:
Rom. xvi. 25.
Footnote 44:
τῶν ἐπιπολαιότερον καὶ μυθικώτερον αὐτοῖς ἐντυγκανόντων.
Footnote 45:
John v. 46, 47.
Footnote 46:
Mark i. 1, 2.
Chapter V.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account