Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
After these matters, although Celsus becomes tautological in his
statements about Jesus, repeating for the second time that “he was
punished by the Jews for his crimes,” we shall not again take up the
defence, being satisfied with what we have already said. But, in the
next place, as this Jew of his disparages the doctrine regarding the
resurrection of the dead, and the divine judgment, and of the rewards to
be bestowed upon the just, and of the fire which is to devour the
wicked, as being stale[47] opinions, and thinks that he will overthrow
Christianity by asserting that there is nothing new in its teaching upon
these points, we have to say to him, that our Lord, seeing the conduct
of the Jews not to be at all in keeping with the teaching of the
prophets, inculcated by a parable that the kingdom of God would be taken
from them, and given to the converts from heathenism. For which reason,
now, we may also see of a truth that all the doctrines of the Jews of
the present day are mere trifles and fables,[48] since they have not the
light that proceeds from the knowledge of the Scriptures; whereas those
of the Christians are the truth, having power to raise and elevate the
soul and understanding of man, and to persuade him to seek a
citizenship, not like the earthly[49] Jews here below, but in heaven.
And this result shows itself among those who are able to see the
grandeur of the ideas contained in the law and the prophets, and who are
able to commend them to others.
Footnote 47:
ἕωλα.
Footnote 48:
μύθους καὶ λήρους.
Footnote 49:
τοῖς κάτω Ἰουδαίοις.
Chapter VI.
But let it be granted that Jesus observed all the Jewish usages,
including even their sacrificial observances, what does that avail to
prevent our recognising Him as the Son of God? Jesus, then, is the Son
of God, who gave the law and the prophets; and we, who belong to the
church, do not transgress the law, but have escaped the
mythologizings[50] of the Jews, and have our minds chastened and
educated by the mystical contemplation of the law and the prophets. For
the prophets themselves, as not resting the sense of these words in the
plain history which they relate, nor in the legal enactments taken
according to the word and letter, express themselves somewhere, when
about to relate histories, in words like this, “I will open my mouth in
parables, I will utter hard sayings of old;”[51] and in another place,
when offering up a prayer regarding the law as being obscure, and
needing divine help for its comprehension, they offer up this prayer,
“Open Thou mine eyes, that I may behold wondrous things out of Thy
law.”[52]
Footnote 50:
μυθολογίας.
Footnote 51:
Ps. lxxvii. 2.
Footnote 52:
Ps. cxix. 18.
Chapter VII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account