Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
This book contains Origen’s answers to the charges which Celsus, in the
person of a Jew, brings against the converts from Judaism to
Christianity. Main charge is, that “they have forsaken the law of their
fathers, in consequence of their minds being led captive by Jesus; that
they have been most ridiculously deceived; and that they have become
deserters to another name and to another mode of life.” Answer to these
charges—chap. i. Digression upon certain declarations of Jesus in the
Gospels—chap. ii. Ignorance of Celsus evinced by the manner in which he
represents the Jew as addressing the Israelitish converts—chap. iii.
Objection of Jew, that Christianity takes its origin from Judaism, and
that after a certain point it discards Judaism: Answer—chap. iv.
Assertion of Celsus, that Jesus was punished by the Jews for His crimes,
already answered—chap. v. Observance by Jesus of Jewish usages and
sacrificial observances, no argument against His recognition as the Son
of God—chap. vi. Language of Jesus furnishes not the slightest evidence,
but the reverse, of arrogance: Quotations—chap. vii. Allegation, that
when men are willing to be deceived, many persons like Jesus would find
a friendly reception; inconsistency of this; various other charges
disposed of—chap. viii. Assertion of Celsus, that Jesus could not be
deemed a god because he was currently reported to have performed none of
his promises, and, after conviction and sentence, was found attempting
to conceal himself and endeavouring to escape, and was then betrayed by
his disciples; impossibility of such things, according to Celsus,
happening to a god: Answer to these calumnies and objections—chaps.
ix.-xi. Assertion of Celsus, that Jesus was inferior to a brigand chief,
because He was betrayed by His disciples: Answer—chap. xii. Celsus
asserts that he omits mention of many things in the life of Christ which
he could state to His disadvantage; challenged to produce such: Several
predictions of Jesus quoted and commented on—chap. xiii. Celsus makes
light of the admission that future events were predicted by Jesus:
Remarks of Origen in answer—chap. xiv. Assertion of Celsus, that the
disciples of Jesus devised the fiction that He foreknew everything
before it happened: Answer—chap. xv. Asserts that the disciples wrote
the accounts they have given by way of extenuating the charges against
Him: Answer—chap. xvi. Celsus alleges that a prudent man—much more a god
or spirit—would have tried to escape dangers that were foreseen, whereas
Jesus did the reverse: Answer—chap. xvii. Objection of Celsus, that the
announcements which Jesus made regarding those disciples who were to
betray and deny Him had not the effect of deterring them from their
treason and perjury, shown to be self-contradictory—chap. xviii. Further
statement of Celsus, that in such cases intending criminals abandon
their intentions, shown to be untrue—chap. xix. Objection, that if Jesus
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account