Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
by those whom Paul calls “perfect” when he said, “We speak wisdom among
them who are perfect,”[104] we pass by for the present, and shall speak
for a little of those matters which are useful for our present purpose.
Footnote 100:
Matt. xxvi. 39.
Footnote 101:
Matt. xxvi. 39.
Footnote 102:
Deut. xxxii. 39.
Footnote 103:
καὶ ταῦτα δὲ, πολλὴν ἔχοντα διήγησιν ἀπὸ σοφίας Θεοῦ οἷς ὁ Παῦλος
ὠνόμασε τελείοις εὐλόγως παραδοθησομένην.
Footnote 104:
1 Cor. ii. 6.
Chapter XXV.
We have mentioned in the preceding pages that there are some of the
declarations of Jesus which refer to that Being in Him which was the
“first-born of every creature,” such as, “I am the way, and the truth,
and the life,” and such like; and others, again, which belong to that in
Him which is understood to be man, such as, “But now ye seek to kill me,
a man that hath told you the truth which I have heard of the
Father.”[105] And here, accordingly, he describes the element of
weakness belonging to human flesh, and that of readiness of spirit which
existed in His humanity: the element of weakness in the expression,
“Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me;” the readiness of
the spirit in this, “Nevertheless, not as I will, but as Thou wilt.” And
since it is proper to observe the order of our quotations, observe that,
in the first place, there is mentioned only the single instance, as one
would say, indicating the weakness of the flesh; and afterwards those
other instances, greater in number, manifesting the willingness of the
spirit. For the expression, “Father, if it be possible, let this cup
pass from me,” is only one: whereas more numerous are those others,
viz., “Not as I will, but as Thou wilt;” and, “O my Father, if this cup
cannot pass from me except I drink it, Thy will be done.” It is to be
noted also, that the words are not, “let this cup depart from me;” but
that the whole expression is marked by a tone of piety and reverence,
“Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me.” I know, indeed,
that there is another explanation of this passage to the following
effect:—The Saviour, foreseeing the sufferings which the Jewish people
and the city of Jerusalem were to undergo in requital of the wicked
deeds which the Jews had dared to perpetrate upon Him, from no other
motive than that of the purest philanthropy towards them, and from a
desire that they might escape the impending calamities, gave utterance
to the prayer, “Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me.”
It is as if He had said, “Because of my drinking this cup of punishment,
the whole nation will be forsaken by Thee, I pray, if it be possible,
that this cup may pass from me, in order that Thy portion, which was
guilty of such crimes against me, may not be altogether deserted by
Thee.” But if, as Celsus would allege, “nothing at that time was done to
Jesus which was either painful or distressing,” how could men afterwards
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account