Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
quote the example of Jesus as enduring sufferings for the sake of
religion, if He did _not_ suffer what are human sufferings, but only had
the _appearance_ of so doing?
Footnote 105:
John viii. 40.
Chapter XXVI.
This Jew of Celsus still accuses the disciples of Jesus of having
invented these statements, saying to them: “Even although guilty of
falsehood, ye have not been able to give a colour of credibility to your
inventions.” In answer to which we have to say, that there was an easy
method of concealing these occurrences,—that, viz., of not recording
them at all. For if the Gospels had not contained the accounts of these
things, who could have reproached us with Jesus having spoken such words
during His stay upon the earth? Celsus, indeed, did not see that it was
an inconsistency for the same persons both to be deceived regarding
Jesus, believing Him to be God, and the subject of prophecy, and to
invent fictions about Him, knowing manifestly that these statements were
false. Of a truth, therefore, they were not guilty of inventing
untruths, but such were their real impressions, and they recorded them
truly; or else they were guilty of falsifying the histories, and did not
entertain these views, and were not deceived when they acknowledged Him
to be God.
Chapter XXVII.
After this he says, that certain of the Christian believers, like
persons who in a fit of drunkenness lay violent hands upon themselves,
have corrupted the Gospel from its original integrity, to a threefold,
and fourfold, and many-fold degree, and have remodelled it, so that they
might be able to answer objections. Now I know of no others who have
altered the Gospel, save the followers of Marcion, and those of
Valentinus, and, I think, also those of Lucian. But such an allegation
is no charge against the Christian system, but against those who dared
so to trifle with the Gospels. And as it is no ground of accusation
against philosophy, that there exist Sophists, or Epicureans, or
Peripatetics, or any others, whoever they may be, who hold false
opinions; so neither is it against genuine Christianity that there are
some who corrupt the Gospel histories, and who introduce heresies
opposed to the meaning of the doctrine of Jesus.
Chapter XXVIII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account