Apologetics -- History -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Celsus (Platonic philosopher), active 180; Theology -- History -- Early Church, ca. 30-600
This objection also is cast in our teeth by Celsus: “From such signs and
misinterpretations, and from proofs so mean, no one could prove him to
be God, and the Son of God.” Now it was his duty to enumerate the
alleged misinterpretations, and to prove them to be such, and to show by
reasoning the meanness of the evidence, in order that the Christian, if
any of his objections should seem to be plausible, might be able to
answer and confute his arguments. What he said, however, regarding
Jesus, did indeed come to pass, because He was a mighty potentate,
although Celsus refuses to see that it so happened, notwithstanding that
the clearest evidence proves it true of Jesus. “For as the sun,” he
says, “which enlightens all other objects, first makes himself visible,
so ought the Son of God to have done.” We would say in reply, that so He
did; for righteousness has arisen in His days, and there is abundance of
peace, which took its commencement at His birth, God preparing the
nations for His teaching, that they might be under one prince, the king
of the Romans, and that it might not, owing to the want of union among
the nations, caused by the existence of many kingdoms, be more difficult
for the apostles of Jesus to accomplish the task enjoined upon them by
their Master, when He said, “Go and teach all nations.” Moreover it is
certain that Jesus was born in the reign of Augustus, who, so to speak,
fused together into one monarchy the many populations of the earth. Now
the existence of many kingdoms would have been a hindrance to the spread
of the doctrine of Jesus throughout the entire world; not only for the
reasons mentioned, but also on account of the necessity of men
everywhere engaging in war, and fighting on behalf of their native
country, which was the case before the times of Augustus, and in periods
still more remote, when necessity arose, as when the Peloponnesians and
Athenians warred against each other, and other nations in like manner.
How, then, was it possible for the gospel doctrine of peace, which does
not permit men to take vengeance even upon enemies, to prevail
throughout the world, unless at the advent of Jesus a milder spirit had
been everywhere introduced into the conduct of things?
Chapter XXXI.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account