It is partly comic and partly sad, to look back and consider the things
for which Roosevelt had fought in his public life, and to recall that
a fight had to be made for things like these; that the man advocating
them had to stand unlimited abuse. He had been abused for trying
to stop the sale of liquor to children, and opposed in his efforts
to prevent the making of cigars in filthy bed-rooms. He had been
violently attacked for enforcing the liquor laws of New York. Lawyers
and public men had grown red with anger as they denounced him as a
tyrant, and an enemy to the Constitution, because he wished to stop
a dishonest system of rebates by the railroads. A man looks back and
wonders if he were living among sane people, or in a mad-house, when
he recalls that Roosevelt was viciously attacked because he proposed
that the meat-packers of this country should not be allowed to sell to
their countrymen rotten and diseased products which foreign countries
refused even to admit. Sneers greeted his attempts to prevent poisons
being sold as medicine, and laudanum being peddled to little children
as soothing-syrup. His fight to prevent greedy folk from destroying
the forests, wasting the minerals, and spoiling the water supplies of
America had to be made in the face of every sort of legal trickery and
the meanest of personal abuse.
The Republican Party had been founded during one of the greatest
efforts for human freedom ever made in our history. In its long years
in power, and in the amazing increase in prosperity and wealth in
America, if had become the defender of wealth. Many of its highest and
most powerful men could see no farther than the cash drawer. Human
rights and wrongs, human suffering, or any attempt to prevent such
sufferings, simply did not interest them. They were not cruel men
personally, but they had heard repeated for so many years that this or
the other thing could not be done "because it would hurt business,"
that they had come to worship "business" as a savage bows his head
before an idol. Many of them could give money for an orphan asylum or
a children's hospital, and yet on the same day, vote to kill a bill
aimed to prevent child-labor. To pass such a bill as that would "hurt
business."
The Democratic Party was no better. It was simply weaker, and usually
less intelligent. Wherever it was powerful, it, too, was apt to be the
servant of corruption. The politicians of both parties loved to keep up
a continual fight about the tariff, to distract public attention from
other important subjects.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account