American wit and humor; Evolution (Biology) -- Wit and humor
If we had been as strong as the elephants, we might have been kinder.
When great power comes naturally to people, it is used more urbanely.
We use it as parvenus do, because that's what we are. The elephant,
being born to it, is easy-going, confident, tolerant. He would have
been a more humane king.
* * * * *
A race descended from elephants would have had to build on a large
scale. Imagine a crowd of huge, wrinkled, slow-moving elephant-men
getting into a vast elephant omnibus.
And would they have ever tried airships?
The elephant is stupid when it comes to learning how to use tools. So
are all other species except our own. Isn't it strange? A tool, in the
most primitive sense, is any object, lying around, that can obviously
be used as an instrument for this or that purpose. Many creatures use
objects as _materials_, as birds use twigs for nests. But the step that
no animal takes is learning freely to use things as instruments. When
an elephant plucks off a branch and swishes his flanks, and thus keeps
away insects, he is using a tool. But he does it only by a vague and
haphazard association of ideas. If he once became a conscious user of
tools he would of course go much further.
We ourselves, who are so good at it now, were slow enough in beginning.
Think of the long epochs that passed before it entered our heads.
And all that while the contest for leadership blindly went on, without
any species making use of this obvious aid. The lesson to be learned
was simple: the reward was the rule of a planet. Yet only one species,
our own, has ever had that much brains.
It makes you wonder what other obvious lessons may still be unlearned.
* * * * *
It is not necessarily stupid however, to fail to use tools. To use
tools involves using reason, instead of sticking to instinct. Now,
sticking to instinct has its disadvantages, but so has using reason.
Whichever faculty you use, the other atrophies, and partly deserts you.
We are trying to use both. But we still don't know which has the more
value.
* * * * *
A sudden vision comes to me of one of the first far-away ape-men who
tried to use reason instead of instinct as a guide for his conduct. I
imagine him, perched in his tree, torn between those two voices,
wailing loudly at night by a river, in his puzzled distress.
My poor far-off brother!
[Illustration: The First Thinker.]
_EIGHT_
We have been considering which species was on the whole most finely
equipped to be rulers, and thereafter achieve a high civilization; but
that wasn't the problem. The real problem was which would _do_
it:--a different matter.
To do it there was need of a species that had at least these two
qualities: some quenchless desire, to urge them on and on; and also
adaptability of a thousand kinds to their environment.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account