Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred WitnessesRemsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
History
Thomas Paine, the Apostle of Liberty: An Address Delivered in Chicago, January 29, 1916; Including the Testimony of Five Hundred Witnesses
Remsburg, John E. (John Eleazer)
Paine, Thomas, 1737-1809
The conclusion, I think, must irresistibly force itself upon your minds
that these reputed faults do not constitute the real head and front
of Thomas Paine's offending. There must be something else. What is it?
Would you have the mystery solved? If so, read his, "Age of Reason."
Read it carefully, thoughtfully, critically; read it with your Bibles
open before you; read it in connection with the ablest refutations that
have been attempted against it. Do this, and the mystery will be solved.
You will then know why Thomas Paine has been so bitterly assailed.
Two champions meet in the arena of debate. One of them, is overwhelmed.
Smiles and groans announce his discomfiture, while shouts of applause
reward the triumph of his rival. Then one of them grows angry, and stung
with madness, drops the sword of argument and seizes in its stead the
bludgeon of malice with which to assail his adversary. But which one
does this, the successful or the defeated antagonist? I have somewhere
read that "the bird that soars on pinions strong and free and is not hit
by the marksman's bullet is not discomposed'"--that "_it is the wounded
bird that flutters!_"
That Thomas Paine was not the poor, drunken, immoral wretch that
priestly virulence represents him to have been, is dearly shown by
the esteem in which he was held by those who knew him best. Would
Dr. Franklin have retained the friendship of a poor, drunken, immoral
wretch? Would Lord Erskine have defended against the government of
England, a poor, drunken, immoral wretch? Would Bishop Watson have
crossed swords in theological disputation with a poor, drunken, immoral
wretch? Would Napoleon Bonaparte, when in the zenith of his fame, have
invited to his table a poor, drunken, immoral wretch? Would France's
greatest women, Roland and De Stael, have stooped to pay the tribute
of praise to a poor, drunken, immoral wretch? Would President Jefferson
have offered a national ship to bear to his home a poor, drunken,
immoral wretch? Would Washington have acknowledged as one of the most
potent factors in achieving American Independence, the pen of a poor,
drunken, immoral wretch? Would the Congress of the United States and the
National Convention of France have bestowed gifts and conferred, honors
upon a poor, drunken, immoral wretch? Impossible! Every fact connected
with his public life refutes these charges made against his private
character.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account