Three Accounts of Peterloo by Eyewitnesses: Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin Smith; with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial — John Shaqi
Three Accounts of Peterloo by Eyewitnesses: Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin Smith; with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the TrialStanley, Edward
History
Three Accounts of Peterloo by Eyewitnesses: Bishop Stanley, Lord Hylton, John Benjamin Smith; with Bishop Stanley's Evidence at the Trial
Stanley, Edward
Manchester (England) -- History; Peterloo Massacre, Manchester, England, 1819
For the rest, it seems better to leave Stanley's extremely lucid account
to speak for itself. To annotate it in detail would be to spoil its
completeness. As has been stated above, each observer witnessed the scene
from his own stand-point. A complete picture can only be obtained by
forming a mosaic of the various reports. Stanley's narrative is that of an
outsider, who came upon the scene unexpectedly, and watched the whole with
the eye of a statesman and a statistician. Lieutenant Jolliffe's account
gives the view of a young soldier, a stranger to Manchester, who rode in
the charge of the Hussars, and afterwards took part with them in the
patrol of the town. Mr. J. B. Smith speaks from the point of view of a
Manchester business man, familiar with the civic and economic conditions
that led to the catastrophe, and his narrative reaches a few days beyond
the tragedy itself. Samuel Bamford's account--too well-known to need
repetition here--was written from the stand-point of a local weaver, who
had already suffered for his outspoken advocacy of Parliamentary Reform,
had a large share in organising the Peterloo meeting, and served a term of
imprisonment for his share in the proceedings. An attempt to dovetail
these and other Reports into a continuous narrative has already been made
in _The Story of Peterloo_ (Rylands Library Lectures, 1919.).
3. Stanley's Evidence at the Trial, which is here printed immediately
after his connected narrative, has been taken from McDonnell's _State
Trials_, supplemented--where passages are omitted by McDonnell--by
Farquharson's verbatim report, issued by the Defence after the Trial. As a
matter of fact McDonnell made use of Farquharson's version.
* * * * *
The portrait of Bishop Stanley which appears here is from a print kindly
lent for the purpose by Lord Sheffield.
Stanley's Notes attached to his Plan
Never having seen St. Peter's fields before or since, I cannot pretend to
speak accurately as to distance, etc. I should, at a guess, state the
distance from the hustings to Mr. Buxton's house to be about a hundred
yards, which may serve as a general scale to the rest of the plan.
KEY TO STANLEY'S PLAN.
1. The hustings. The arrow shows the direction in which the orators
addressed the mob, the great majority being in front: F, F, F.
2. The Barouche in which Hunt arrived, the line from it showing its
entrance and approach.
3. The spot on which the Manchester Yeomanry Cavalry halted previous to
their charge; the dotted lines in front showing the direction of their
charge on attacking the hustings.
[Illustration: Stanley's Plan]
4. On this spot the woman alluded to in the account (p. 15) was wounded
and remained apparently dead, till removed at the conclusion of the
business.
5. Here the 15th Dragoons paused for a few moments before they proceeded
in the direction marked by the dotted line.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account