Three Plays by Brieux: With a Preface by Bernard Shaw — John Shaqi
Three Plays by Brieux: With a Preface by Bernard ShawBrieux, Eugène
General
Three Plays by Brieux: With a Preface by Bernard Shaw
Brieux, Eugène
French drama -- Translations into English
These differences between nation and nation also exist between class
and class and between town and country. I will not here go into the
vexed question of whether the peasant’s way of blowing his nose or
the squire’s is the more cleanly and hygienic, though my experience
as a municipal councillor of the way in which epidemics are spread
by laundries makes me incline to the side of the peasant. What is
beyond all question is that each seems disgusting to the other. And
when we come from physical facts to moral views and ethical opinions
we find the same antagonisms. To a great section—perhaps the largest
section—of the people of England and France, all novels, plays, and
songs are licentious; and the habit of enjoying them is a mark of a
worthless character. To these people the distinctions made by the
literary classes between books fit for young girls to read and improper
books—between Paul and Virginia and Mademoiselle de Maupin or Une Vie,
between Mrs. Humphry Ward and Ouida—have no meaning: all writers of
love stories and all readers of them are alike shameless. Cultivated
Paris, cultivated London, are apt to overlook people who, as they
seldom read and never write, have no means of making themselves heard.
But such simple people heavily outnumber the cultivated; and if they
could also outwit them, literature would perish. Yet their intolerance
of fiction is as nothing to their intolerance of fact. I lately heard
an English gentleman state a very simple fact in these terms: ‘I never
could get on with my mother: she did not like me; and I did not like
her: my brother was her pet.’ To an immense number of living English
and French people this speech would suggest that its utterer ought
to be burned alive, though the substitution of stepmother for mother
and of half-brother for brother would suffice to make it seem quite
probable and natural. And this, observe, not in the least because all
these horrified people adore and are adored by their mothers, but
simply because they have a fixed convention that the proper name of the
relation between mother and son is love. However bitter and hostile it
may in fact be in some cases, to call it by any other name is a breach
of convention; and by the instinctive logic of timidity they infer
that a man to whom convention is not sacred is a dangerous man. To them
the ten commandments are nothing but arbitrary conventions; and the man
who says today that he does not love his mother may, they conclude,
tomorrow steal, rob, murder, commit adultery, and bear false witness
against his neighbor.
The Dread of the Original Thinker.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account