It may be asked why the Niger Company gives to second parties, even by
sale, the opportunity of making a profit which it might itself reap.
Whilst I am no more empowered than any other investigator to speak for
the Company, I should say that the reason is the one stated above. No
doubt the Company is only on the threshold of the advance to be made
in trading development—trading in agricultural, sylvan, and other
produce—in Southern and Northern Nigeria, and to do that adequately
is, to use an inelegant but expressive term, to bite off as much as it
can chew. The fact should be remembered that it gains by everyone’s
prosperity.
On surrendering the Charter, the Government agreed to give the Company
half of its 5 per cent. royalty on the export of all minerals. Besides
the river and road transport, prosperous communities, white and black,
mean increased trade for the stores, for although there are a number of
such new arrivals in Northern Nigeria the Niger Company maintains an
incalculably premier position.
Present regulations for mining are explained in the next chapter.
* * * * *
The health of every white man on a mine in Northern Nigeria is a serious
matter for each owning company. Flesh and blood is not as cheap as in
some parts of industrial Britain; it cannot be replaced at a day’s notice
and to an illimitable extent. A man, whether he be manager or in any
intermediate grade to the most junior rank, is brought out at no little
expense. If he becomes altogether incapacitated at an early stage of
his service the persons in whose engagement he is lose what the double
journey costs, for he will probably not have rendered sufficient work
to recoup them; whilst if he goes temporarily on the sick list as long
as he remains there he, of course, is not earning anything for the firm
which has paid his expenses. Men of use in Northern Nigeria are therefore
valuable, as horses are where it costs money to replace them, though
perhaps in the same place there is so great a supply of human animals
that _their_ living or dying is of no economic consequence.
The question is put at its lowest commercial basis so that the importance
of health may be seen from every point of view, and in setting the
position in that light I rely on my meaning not being misinterpreted to
read that men in the service of mines are only rated as horses. I desire
to show that a mine—or, for the matter of that, any other employing
concern—in most cases loses by the breakdown of a member of the staff.
Here the mines’ employees are alone being dealt with.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account