Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting — John Shaqi
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
In his travels in the East the hermit had learned to make certain
grenades which would burn and which no water could extinguish. For
several days he was busy making some of these. One day he informed
the king he was ready to carry out a plan by which he hoped to deal
a severe blow to the enemy. That night he disguised himself as a
Moor and, carrying a number of grenades, reached the camp of the
invaders. He set fire to the camp, and while the infidels were trying
to extinguish the fire, the English came out of the city and attacked
them. Many Moors were slain, and the rest fled in disorder to the
castle of Alimburch. (Chaps. 10-12)
From this place, the great King of Canary sent ambassadors to the
English king with a letter in which he proposed that, to avoid further
bloodshed, the two kings should engage in mortal combat. If the Moorish
king should be the victor, the English king was to recognize him as
his lord and pay a heavy tribute every year. If, on the other hand,
the English king should win, then the Moors were to return to their
own land, and England should again enjoy peace. This proposal was
immediately accepted by the English sovereign. (Chaps. 13-14)
Then the King of England convened the General Council to deliberate
over the matter. The hermit was first asked to give his advice. He
suggested that since the Moorish king was a strong and hardy man, and
the English king young and feeble, some one who was more likely to win
over such a formidable adversary should fight in place of England’s
king. Moreover, he proposed that the Duke of Lancaster, the uncle of
the king, should be the person to represent him in the combat. But
immediately three dukes, the Duke of Gloucester, the Duke of Bedford,
and the Duke of Exeter, protested loudly that, since they were more
closely related to the king, the honor of representing him should
devolve upon them. But the king was unwilling that any one should fight
in his place. However, he was finally persuaded that this should be
done, and he yielded only on condition that he be permitted to name
the substitute, to whom he also intended to surrender the royal crown
and scepter. He nominated the hermit, who wished to decline, but was
finally induced to put on the royal robes. The regal power was then
conferred upon him in the presence of a notary. Arms were brought, from
which he was to select those that he preferred. But he chose none of
these. He asked that the arms of William of Warwick be obtained from
the Countess. The latter sent certain arms, but they were not the ones
that he wanted. Those that he desired were kept in the chamber of the
Countess. The astonished lady gave the hermit permission to enter her
chamber, and he there equipped himself for the coming combat. (Chaps.
14-19)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account