Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting — John Shaqi
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
While Tirant was storming a strongly fortified city, held by the Turks,
two thousand soldiers, under the command of the Prior of St. John,
joined him and placed themselves under his direction. These had been
sent by the Grand Master of the Knights of St. John from Rhodes. They
assisted in the plundering of the city, for a breach had already been
made in the walls of the place when they arrived. (Chap. 139)
In the meanwhile the Turks had received reinforcements in great
numbers. They encamped on one side of a river, and the imperial
forces on the other side. About a league farther up the river there
was a stone bridge held by a faithful subject of the emperor. It was
protected by a castle at each one of the approaches, so that the Turks
were unable to cross over it. One of these castles was guarded by the
knight Mal Vehi, and the other by his son, Hypolite (Hippolyte). The
latter was a bold and valiant youth, who soon became an enthusiastic
admirer of Tirant. At the earnest request of both father and son, our
hero conferred the honors of knighthood upon Hypolite. (Chap. 140)
The Turks began to construct a bridge in order that they might cross
the river to attack the Greek forces. When Tirant saw this, he ordered
his men to build a considerable number of boats. These were then
fastened together, and upon them was erected a framework to support
a large quantity of light and inflammable wood. When this peculiar
construction was completed, it was fastened to the stone bridge and
“camouflaged” with branches so that the enemy might not see it. (Chap.
140)
As soon as the Turks had finished their wooden bridge, they crossed
over it. As they were coming over, Tirant led his forces up to the
stone bridge. By the time that the enemy arrived there, the Greeks
were already on the other side, and the passage over the bridge was
closed. Then the Turks went back over their bridge to the other side,
whereupon Tirant crossed back over the stone bridge. These maneuvers
continued for three days. Finally the Moors decided to divide their
forces, and that was exactly what Tirant desired them to do. When one
of the divisions came over, the Greeks went up a mountain near the
wooden bridge. Since it was growing dark, the Turks decided to stop
at the foot of the mountain and make an attack the next morning. In
the darkness of the night, Tirant sent the floating construction down
the stream, and it was set on fire just before it reached the wooden
bridge. When the Turks who had crossed saw the fire and realized that
their bridge would be destroyed, they became panic-stricken and rushed
wildly to return to the other side of the river. In the disorder and
confusion many were pushed off the bridge and were drowned. Twenty-two
thousand of them were unable to get back, and these surrendered to
Tirant the next morning. (Chaps. 140-141)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account