Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting — John Shaqi
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical settingVaeth, Joseph Anthony
History
Tirant lo Blanch; a study of its authorship, principal sources and historical setting
Vaeth, Joseph Anthony
Martorell, Joanot, -1468. Tirant lo Blanch
In the meantime the Duke of Macedonia had sent a messenger to
Constantinople to report to the emperor that the vile foreigner, Tirant
lo Blanch, had led the whole army to destruction and had fled no one
knew whither. The false news plunged the aged emperor into gloom and
dejection, and the whole city was filled with weeping and lamentation.
(Chap. 141)
As soon as those of the Turks who had not been able to rejoin the main
body of the army surrendered, Diaphebus again sent a messenger to the
imperial city to announce the successful event. But when he arrived
there, the emperor would not receive him. Finally he succeeded in
delivering the message to the princess. She immediately reported it to
her father, who fell unconscious from excess of joy. And again all the
bells of the city were rung, and thanks were offered up to God. (Chap.
141)
The Constable and Diaphebus took the prisoners to Constantinople. In
recounting the exploits of Tirant in the field, the Constable gave
unlimited praise to the young Capita Major. Diaphebus naturally made
an effort to see the princess and Stephania, and not without success.
The words he spoke to Carmesina increased greatly her admiration for
Tirant. His own love affair made wonderful progress during this visit.
(Chaps. 144-148)
The Turks, having lost one hundred thousand men since Tirant became the
leader of the imperial army, held a council, in which it was decreed
that the foreign captain, Tirant lo Blanch, must be slain. The King of
Egypt was designated as the one to accomplish this, since he was the
most skillful of them all in the use of arms. The sultan himself said:
“If this devil of a man had not come from France, we should even now be
in the palace of Constantinople, and should already have made a mosque
of the beautiful church there. We shall never be able to accomplish
that, if this captain lives much longer.” (Chaps. 148-149)
The King of Egypt accordingly challenged Tirant to mortal combat. In
the challenge this king stated that he had made a vow to his lady-love
that he would engage in a _combat à outrance_ with a king or a king’s
son, or with the best captain of the Christian army, and that it was
his intention to send her the head of Tirant to show that his vow had
been accomplished. He also suggested that each one of them should
champion the cause of a lady, and then the combat should also determine
which one of these ladies excelled in beauty, dignity, virtue,
lineage, grace, and wisdom. The challenge and the suggestion were
accepted. It was agreed that the King of Egypt should fight in behalf
of his lady-love, the Grand Turk’s daughter, and Tirant, in behalf of
Carmesina, the emperor’s daughter. The combat was to take place on the
field of battle, on August the twentieth, four days earlier, or four
days later. (Chaps. 149-152)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account