Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
History
Towards an enduring peace : $b A symposium of peace proposals and programs 1914-1916
Peace; World War, 1914-1918 -- Peace
ECONOMIC IMPERIALISM
[Sidenote: Evil of “spheres of influence.” “Spheres” become
“dependencies.”]
The evils of an unrestricted competition for concessions and monopolies
between rival financial groups backed by their Governments, are so
notorious that diplomacy has found several typical formulæ for bringing
them to an end. The obvious method of resolving such conflicts is the
demarcation of spheres of “influences,” “interest” or “penetration”
within which each of the competing Powers enjoys a monopoly respected by
the others. This method is open to two grave objections. In the first
place, it is rarely adopted before a ruinous conflict has exhausted the
competitors. For years or decades they carry on a trial of strength
which affects not merely their local relationship, but their attitude to
one another in Europe, and is measured year by year in their military
and naval estimates. If we were to take the sum by which British and
German armaments have increased in the present century, it would be
possible to allocate the increase, roughly, somewhat as follows: 50 per
cent. or less for the settlement of the question, Who shall exploit
Morocco?; 25 per cent. or more for the privilege of building a railway to
Bagdad and beyond it; 25 per cent. or more for the future eventualities
which remain unsettled—the fate of the Portuguese colonies in Africa,
and the destinies of China. In the second place, the delimitation of
spheres of interest is almost inevitably fatal to the national existence
of the country partitioned, and as inevitably adds a vast burden to
the commitments of the Imperial Power. Persia furnishes the obvious
illustration. Sir Edward Grey is clearly resolved that he will not allow
himself by the march of events to be drawn into the assumption of any
direct responsibility for the administration of the British sphere. It is
a laudable resolve, but Russia may at any moment frustrate it. She deals
with her own sphere on the opposite principle, and her sphere happens to
include the seat of the central government. That government is already
a puppet of Russian policy, enjoying only a simulacrum of independence.
How much longer can a government which is not a government continue
to rule the southern sphere? Sooner or later a choice must be made.
Either Russia must withdraw, or some separate government under British
protection must be created for the south. Turkey is drifting rapidly
towards a dissolution in which the spheres which the Great Powers already
claim will be formally delimited. It is easy to predict what that will
mean. There will be first provincial loans, then provincial advisers,
and finally a military control, under which each of these “spheres” will
become what Egypt already is, a dependency of a European Power.
[Sidenote: How to avoid the evil. Must preserve peace without destroying
victim nationality.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account