Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
As a check on the average figures obtained from various sources, the
following estimate of the cost of drilling per cubic yard was made up
from these average figures, for comparison with the actual average cost
on the whole work. The cost records show this to be about $2.25 per yd.,
exclusive of power for running the drills, almost exactly what the
following estimates give for theoretical average conditions, although no
effort was made to have this latter compare so closely.
_Estimated Cost per Drill per Day._
Drill Runner 1 at $3.50 per day, $3.50
Helper 1 ” 2.00 ” ” 2.00
Nipper 1/5 ” 1.75 ” ” 0.35
Heading foreman 1/12 ” 5.00 ” ” 0.42
Walking boss 1/50 ” 7.50 ” ” 0.15
Blacksmith 1/12 ” 4.00 ” ” 0.34
Blacksmith helper 1/12 ” 2.00 ” ” 0.16
Machinist 1/12 ” 3.00 ” ” 0.25
Machinist helper 1/24 ” 1.75 ” ” 0.07
Pipe fitter and helper 1/50 ” 5.00 ” ” 0.10
Oil, waste, blacksmith coal, etc. 0.24
Drill steel, 6 in. per shift 0.20
-----
$7.78
Average number of feet drilled per cubic yard 3 to 3.5
Number of feet drilled per drill, per shift 10.5 to 12
Number of yards per drill, per shift 3.5±
Cost of drilling, per yard, $7.78/3.5 $2.22±
In all the foregoing tables and computations, the quantities used have
been those paid for. The quantity taken out, however, has been 10% more
than that paid for, and 28% more than the contractor was actually
required to take out.
The specifications required that the excavation should be taken entirely
outside of the neat line, as shown on Plate VIII of the paper by Mr.
Jacobs, but not necessarily beyond this line, but that the contractor
would be paid for rock out to the standard section line, which is 1 ft.
larger on the sides and top and 6 in. deeper in the bottom than the neat
line.
A great deal of the extra quantity was due to rock falling from the
core-wall side whenever one working face was behind the other. Blasting
at the face behind generally loosened more or less rock on the core-wall
side of the tunnel which was ahead, in one or two instances breaking
entirely through, as shown in Fig. 2, Plate XXVI, the hole in the
core-wall in this case being utilized by building a storage chamber in
it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account