Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154 — John Shaqi
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
The concrete for the arches and bench-walls was loaded at the mixers
into 1-yd., Stuebner, bottom-dumping buckets which just held a 4-bag
batch. These buckets were placed on small flat cars, hauled into the
tunnel, placed beneath the traveling gantry, as shown by Fig. 1, Plate
XXIV, and hoisted to the platform above.
These traveling gantries, the details of which are shown by Fig. 12,
consisted essentially of platforms at each end of which an =A=-frame was
erected; the latter supported at their apexes two =I=-beams, from the
lower flanges of which was suspended a traveling block, shown at _A_,
Fig. 12, and through which the hoisting rope was rigged. The buckets
were hoisted through an opening in the platform and then moved along to
where they could be dumped. The platforms were supported on wheels
traveling on rails laid on the concrete of the foundation (for the
bench-wall gantries) or on top of the bench-wall (for the arch
gantries).
Each of the first two of these traveling gantries used was equipped with
a belt conveyor working on a cantilever arm, as shown by Figs. 3 and 4,
Plate XXI, and Figs. 1 and 2, Plate XXIV. In using these belt conveyors,
the concrete was dumped from the Stuebner bucket into a hopper, Fig. 1,
Plate XXIV, with an adjustable slot in the bottom, under which the belt
ran.
[Illustration: Fig. 12. [Full Page]
DETAILS OF TRAVELING GANTRY USED IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TUNNEL
LINING:
SECTIONAL ELEVATION
CROSS-SECTION
A. DETAIL OF TRAVELING BLOCK
B. DETAIL OF TOP SHEAVE
C. DETAIL OF LOWER SHEAVE.]
It was the original intention, in designing the conveyor, that the end
of the cantilever arm should be swung from one side of the tunnel to the
other, and that the traveler should be moved backward or forward, as
might be required, and thus deliver the concrete from the end of the
belt directly over the place in which it was to be deposited in the
bench-walls. As a matter of fact, it was found impractical in operation
to move the gantry readily, owing to its great weight, which was
supported on only four ordinary car wheels and their bearings, and it
was found more convenient to leave the arm in one position near the
center, letting the concrete drop on the platform above the bench- or
sand-wall forms, whence it could be shoveled into place, than to attempt
to move it as had been intended. Both of these difficulties might
possibly have been overcome by modifications in the design of the gantry
and conveyor, had this method of handling the concrete seemed otherwise
desirable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account