Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
The principal difficulty with its use, however, was the inability to
take care of more than one batch of concrete at a time. When one batch
had been dumped into the hopper, a second could not be disposed of until
the first had nearly all run through on the belt, and this took from 7
to 20 min., varying with the consistency of the concrete, etc. In a few
instances, where there happened to be some fairly dry batches, the
concrete could not be started through the slot at all, and had to be
shoveled out of the hopper. On the other hand, it is stated that some
batches, under favorable conditions, passed through in about 2 min., but
this was quite exceptional, and the operation was irregular and
uncertain.
Before the final method of handling the concrete was adopted, a trial
was made of two forms of cars and buckets, to be used on the top
platform, as shown by Figs. 3 and 4, and Plate XXIV. In the method shown
by Fig. 3, Plate XXIV, the concrete was hoisted in the regular Stuebner
buckets, one of which can be seen suspended in the background of this
photograph, and dumped into the car shown, which was mounted so that it
could be revolved in a horizontal plane. It was intended to move this
car on the tracks to the point at which the concrete was required, and
dump it directly through a chute into the bench-walls. This car was
abandoned, as there was a great deal of difficulty in turning it when it
was loaded, and in several instances it had to be dumped straight ahead
in the middle of the platform and the concrete shoveled into the forms.
This method was also objectionable when the bucket was dumped, inasmuch
as the force of the impact of a whole batch of concrete dumped from such
a height into the forms, not only tended to throw the conduits out of
line, and to break them, but also caused considerable strain on the
forms.
The bucket shown by Fig. 4, Plate XXIV, was next tried. It had a
slanting bottom and a door opening at the side. It was filled at the
mixer, came into the tunnel on a small flat car, and was hoisted and
placed on a similar car on top, as shown. This bucket was not
successful, as its great weight made it difficult to handle, and it
generally required a man to shovel the concrete out, which latter, of
course, had been pretty well compacted in the bottom of the bucket by
its trip from the mixer. All these cars were hauled backward and forward
on the top platform by a rope running to the winch on the hoisting
engine on the traveling gantry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154 — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account