Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
Considerable attention was given to breaking the joints of the ducts
properly, so as to maintain throughout the conduit lines the greatest
break possible. The joints in each superimposed line were broken at half
the length of the individual pieces of conduit, the joints in lines in
the same horizontal plane being broken at one-quarter the length, thus
preventing any joints from touching one another either at the sides or
corners, which tended to prevent a burn-out on one line from being
communicated to another. There was some little difficulty at first in
maintaining the breaks, owing to slight variations in the lengths of the
conduit, but after a very short time both the workmen and the inspectors
became very expert at this and in the proper use of short lengths to
maintain the spacing; after the first few weeks there was little if any
difficulty in attaining at all times almost perfect results. The method
of making the breaks is shown in the photographs and by the isometric
sketch at _F_, Fig. 15.
All the conduits used on this work were furnished by the Great Eastern
Clay Company, and were made at its factory at South River, N.J., where
they were inspected before shipment.
The mandrel used in the final rodding was made as shown at _G_, Fig. 15,
the larger size being used for all lines. The rods for pushing it
through the conduit lines were made of 6½-ft. lengths of ordinary 1-in.
wrought-iron pipe with extra long (3-in.) couplings. The lines were
rodded in both directions from alternate manholes, thus avoiding
uncoupling the rods and allowing every pull to be effective in pushing
the mandrel through the ducts.
[Illustration: Fig. 15. [Full Page]
ELECTRICAL CONDUITS: METHODS OF LAYING, RODDING, ETC.
A. FORK ENDED STEEL BONDS FOR CONDUITS.
B. SEQUENCE OF METHODS OF BUILDING BENCH-WALL PROPOSED WHEN USING
EXPANDED METAL BONDS.
C. ISOMETRIC DRAWING OF EXPANDING MANDREL.
D. DETAILS OF “WEASEL” Used for gripping disconnected pipe rods in
conduit
E. CUTTER FOR REMOVING OBSTRUCTIONS IN CONDUITS.
F. ISOMETRIC SKETCH SHOWING METHOD OF BREAKING JOINTS AND POSITION
FORKED BONDS.
G. PLAN AND SECTIONS OF EXPANDING MANDREL.
INDEX
+-----+------------+-------------+
| | Multi-Duct | Single-Duct |
| | Mandrel | Mandrel |
+-----+------------+-------------+
| _A_ | 3¼” | 3⅜” |
| _B_ | ¾” | ⅞” |
| _C_ | 2½” | 2⅝” |
+-----+------------+-------------+
Note
End pipe connections may be changed to suit connections of rodding
outfit, care being taken to use a connection which will not split and
expand the mandrel if it should be driven back into it, in attempting
to ram the mandrel back when stuck in a duct.
Connection at Head End may be dispensed with, if the mandrel is
threaded through ducts by rods attached to the trailing end.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account