Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
Before the lining was started, however, the excavation had progressed
sufficiently to show that the tunnels, while very wet in places, and
varying from that to quite damp, would be, on the whole, much dryer than
had been anticipated. It was then decided to substitute concrete for the
brick in the arch and omit the water-proofing over the top, except at
places where water came into the tunnels in sufficiently large
quantities to form practically a continuous stream. Three general types
of construction for the arch were decided on, as shown in Fig. 18. The
first, as shown at _A_, was to be used where the tunnel was quite dry.
In this type, the sand-wall was omitted entirely, and the concrete and
rock packing were built up together, the rock packing impinging to a
certain extent on the concrete, and the concrete squeezing somewhat into
the rock packing, as shown by Fig. 4, Plate XXV. The section shown at
_B_ was used where the tunnels were damp, or where there were slight
droppers not forming a continuous stream. The back lagging, of 1-in.
boards, which was left in place, provided a practically smooth outer
surface on the concrete arch, and allowing the concrete and rock packing
to be built almost simultaneously. It was considered that the free
drainage through the rock packing, the surface of the boards, and the
smooth outer surface of the concrete in the arch would allow the
comparatively small quantity of water in these parts of the tunnel to
find its way to the sides, and thence to the ditches at the bottom,
rather than to percolate through the concrete, and this proved to be
very generally the case, as is shown by the dry condition of the tunnel
as built. The back lagging was used over the arch, both where the
sand-wall was built and where it was omitted, as well as being placed
over the water-proofing of the arch as an armor course where
water-proofing was required. Where the sand-walls were built and
water-proofed, and where the water-proofing was not carried over the
arch, the water-proofing was turned in at the top, as shown at _C_, Fig.
18.
[Illustration: Fig. 18. [Full Page]
VARIOUS TYPES OF ARCHES, AND WATER-PROOFING USED
Method of Lapping Mats over Arch
Method of making joint when work on section was not continuous. Part
of joint on radial line, part sloping slightly toward outside of
arch.
DETAILS OF WATER-PROOFING
One layer of felt with 4" overlap to be nailed to lagging of inch
boards, using tin washers on nails over the whole of the intrados
of the arch before starting any concrete or placing any of the
permanent felt and pitch water-proofing. The water-proofing over
the arch can be laid in mats of three thicknesses of felt properly
joined together with pitch made as shown diagrammatically at “_x_”
Each of these mats of three-ply felt will be overlapped half the
width of the mat, as shown diagrammatically at “_y_”]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account