Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154Lavis, F.
History
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, vol. LXVIII, Sept. 1910: The Bergen Hill Tunnels. Paper No. 1154
Lavis, F.
Civil engineering -- Periodicals; Railroad tunnels -- Design and construction
The third method provided for water-proofing the whole of the arch, and
was the same as _B_ except for the addition of the water-proofing inside
the back lagging. In placing this water-proofing, the felt was cut in
strips about 11 ft. long (about 1 ft. longer than the length of a
section of arch), and six thicknesses were cemented together with hot
pitch. These mats were then laid shingle-fashion, as shown at _D_, Fig.
18, up the sides of the arch until a space about 5 ft. wide remained at
the crown; shorter mats were then brought out over this, laying them
perpendicular to the axis of the tunnel. Care was taken in making all
laps, irrespective of the direction in which the arch was built, so that
they would lay with the grade, that is, so that the water would tend to
flow over the edges of the laps rather than against them.
Most of the wet sections of the tunnel were at the ends, where
sand-walls had been built for the purpose of providing a smooth surface
against which the water-proofing was to be placed; there were several
wet places at isolated points in the tunnels, however, and, in order to
avoid building sand-walls at these points, the method shown at _E_, Fig.
18, was adopted. This involved a slightly larger excavation, 2 ft.
outside of the neat line, up to the height of the top of the bench,
where there was not already that much room. The bench-wall was built
with a back form on the neat line, the water-proofing was placed as
shown, protected by an armor course of brick, and then continued over
the arch when this latter was built. The excavation and refilling with
rock packing were done at the contractor’s expense, which he was willing
to assume rather than build these short sections of sand-wall.
[Illustration: Plate XXVII.
Fig. 1: K 181. P.R.R. Tunnels, N. R. Div. Sect. K. (Bergen Hill
Tunnels.) Timbered section near Weehawken Shaft, showing method of
placing waterproofing and keying arch. Dec. 8, 08.
Fig. 2: K 184. P.R.R. Tunnels, N. R. Div. Sect. K. (Bergen Hill
Tunnels). View of completed tunnel looking Eastward from Sta.
323+60. South Tunnel. Feb. 8, 09.
Fig. 3: K 149. P.R.R. Tunnels, N. R. Div. Sect. K. (Bergen Hill
Tunnels) Hackensack Portal, general view of completed Portal, and
arches through cut and cover section looking East. Oct. 15, 07.
Fig. 4: K 190. P.R.R. Tunnels, N. R. Div. Sect. K. (Bergen Hill
Tunnels.) Hackensack Approach. General view, looking East. March 16,
09.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account