Transcendentalism in New England: A HistoryFrothingham, Octavius Brooks
Philosophy
Transcendentalism in New England: A History
Frothingham, Octavius Brooks
Transcendentalism (New England)
The heights were gained nevertheless, and kept long enough for a view of
the land of promise; and ever since, though the ascent is a dim
recollection, and the great forms have come to look like images in
dreams, and the mighty voices are but ghostly echoes, men and women have
been happy in laboring for the heaven their fathers believed they saw.
VII.
PRACTICAL TENDENCIES.
Mr. Emerson--we find ourselves continually appealing to him as the
finest interpreter of the transcendental movement--made a confession
which its enemies were quick to seize on and turn to their purpose.
"It is a sign of our times, conspicuous to the coarsest observer,
that many intelligent and religious persons withdraw themselves
from the common labors and competitions of the market and the
caucus, and betake themselves to a certain solitary and critical
way of living, from which no solid fruit has yet appeared to
justify their separation. They hold themselves aloof; they feel the
disproportion between themselves and the work offered them, and
they prefer to ramble in the country and perish of ennui, to the
degradation of such charities and such ambitions as the city can
propose to them. They are striking work and crying out for somewhat
worthy to do. They are lonely; the spirit of their writing and
conversation is lonely; they repel influences; they shun general
society; they incline to shut themselves in their chamber in the
house; to live in the country rather than in the town; and to find
their tasks and amusements in solitude. They are not good citizens;
not good members of society; unwillingly they bear their part of
the public and private burdens; they do not willingly share in the
public charities, in the public religious rites, in the enterprises
of education, of missions, foreign or domestic, in the abolition of
the slave trade, or in the temperance society. They do not even
like to vote. The philanthropists inquire whether Transcendentalism
does not mean sloth; they had as lief hear that their friend is
dead as that he is a Transcendentalist; for then is he paralyzed,
and can do nothing for humanity."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account