Travels in Peru and India: While Superintending the Collection of Chinchona Plants and Seeds in South America, and Their Introduction into India.Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
History
Travels in Peru and India: While Superintending the Collection of Chinchona Plants and Seeds in South America, and Their Introduction into India.
Markham, Clements R. (Clements Robert), Sir
Cinchona; India -- Description and travel; Peru -- Description and travel
From Arica 1926 quintals, worth £17,334
" Islay 1365 " " 12,383
---- ------
3291 29,717
---- ------
Jan. 1st to Nov. 30th, 1860, Arica $160,260 = £35,000 (about).
1860, Islay, 1077 quintals.
CHAPTER III.
Rapid destruction of chinchona-trees in South America--Importance
of their introduction into other countries--M. Hasskarl's
mission--Chinchona plantations in Java.
THE collection of bark in the South American forests was conducted from
the first with reckless extravagance; no attempt worthy the name has
ever been made either with a view to the conservancy or cultivation
of the chinchona-trees; and both the complete abandonment of the
forests to the mercy of every speculator, as in Peru, Ecuador, and New
Granada, and the barbarous meddling legislation of Bolivia, have led
to equally destructive results. The bark-collector enters the forest
and destroys the first clump of chinchona-trees he finds, without a
thought of any measure to preserve the continuance of a supply of bark.
Thus, in Apollobamba, where the trees once grew thickly round the
village, no full-grown one is now to be found within eight or ten days'
journey:[85] and so utterly improvident are the collectors that, in the
forests of Cochabamba, they bark the tree without felling, and thus
ensure its death; or, if they cut it down, they actually neglect to
take off the bark on the side touching the ground, to save themselves
the trouble of turning the trunk over.[86]
A century ago Condamine[87] raised a warning voice against the
destruction that was going on in the forests of Loxa. Ulloa[88] advised
the Government to check it by legislation; soon afterwards Humboldt
reported that 25,000 chinchona-trees were destroyed every year, and
Ruiz[89] protested against the custom of barking the trees, and leaving
them to be destroyed by rot. But nothing was ever done in the way
of conservancy, either by the Government, or by private speculators
whose subsistence depended on a continued supply of bark. Dr. Weddell,
alluding to this recklessness as regards _C. Calisaya_, observes that
"the forests of Bolivia, rich as they are, cannot long resist the
continued attacks to which they have been recently exposed. He who, in
Europe, sees these enormous and ever-increasing masses of bark arrive,
may perhaps believe that they will continue to do so; but he who sees
the chinchona-trees in their native forests, and knows the real truth,
is obliged to think otherwise."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account