Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773Bruce, James
History
Travels to Discover the Source of the Nile, Volume 1 (of 5): In the years 1768, 1769, 1770, 1771, 1772 and 1773
Bruce, James
Egypt -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- Description and travel; Ethiopia -- History; Natural history -- Ethiopia; Nile River
Others are for giving to letters a divine original: they say they
were taught to Abraham by God himself; but this is no where vouched;
though it cannot be denied, that it appears from scripture there were
two sorts of characters known to Moses, when God spoke to him on Mount
Sinai. The first two tables, we are told, were wrote by the finger of
God, in what character is not said, but Moses received them to read
to the people, so he surely understood them. But, when he had broken
these two tables, and had another meeting with God on the mount on
the subject of the law, God directs him specially not to write in the
Egyptian character or hieroglyphics, but in the current hand used by
the Ethiopian merchants, _like the letters_ upon a signet; that is,
he should not write in hieroglyphics by a _picture_, representing the
_thing_, for that the law forbids; and the bad consequences of this
were evident; but he should write the law in the current hand, by
characters representing sounds, (though nothing else in heaven or on
earth,) or by the letters that the Ishmaelites, Cushites, and India
trading nations had long used in business for signing their invoices,
engagements, &c. and this was the meaning of being _like the letters of
a signet_.
Hence, it is very clear, God did not invent letters, nor did Moses,
who understood both characters before the promulgation of the law upon
Mount Sinai, having learned them in Egypt, and during his long stay
among the Cushites, and Shepherds in Arabia Petrea. Hence it should
appear also, that the sacred character of the Egyptian was considered
as profane, and forbid to the Hebrews, and that the common Ethiopic was
the Hebrew sacred character, in which the copy of the law was first
wrote. The text is very clear and explicit: “And the stones shall be
with the _names_ of the children of Israel, twelve, according to their
_names, like_ the engravings of _signet_; every one with his _name_,
shall they be according to the twelve tribes[265].” Which is plainly,
You shall not write in the way used till this day, for it leads the
people into idolatry; you shall not type Judah by a _lion_, Zebulun by
_ship_, Issachar by an _ass_ couching between two burdens; but, instead
of writing by pictures, you shall take the other known hand, the
merchants writing, which signifies _sounds_, not _things_; write the
names Judah, Zebulun, Issachar, in the letters, such as the merchants
use upon their signets. And, on Aaron’s breast-plate of pure gold, was
to be written, in the same alphabet, like the engravings of a signet,
HOLINESS TO THE LORD[266].
These signets, of the remotest antiquity in the East, are worn still
upon every man’s hand to this day, having the name of the person that
wears them, or some sentence upon it always religious. The Greeks,
after the Egyptians, continued the other method, and described figures
upon their signet; the use of both has been always common in Britain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account