Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physicChristison, Robert, Sir
Science
Treatise on Poisons: In relation to medical jurisprudence, physiology, and the practice of physic
Christison, Robert, Sir
Medical jurisprudence; Toxicology
This idiosyncrasy may even be acquired. One of my relations, who was for
many years violently affected by very small quantities of the richer
kinds of fish, used at a previous period to eat them, and can now again
do so, with impunity. Many people have acquired a similar idiosyncrasy
with respect to eggs; instances of the same kind will be afterwards
mentioned in respect to shell-fish, particularly muscles; indeed there
are probably few articles of food in regard to which such idiosyncrasies
may not in a few rare instances be met with, if we except the grains and
common kinds of butcher-meat. I may add, that from facts which have come
under my notice, I have sometimes suspected that a similar idiosyncrasy
may be acquired in a slight degree, and for a short time only, in regard
even to some kinds of butcher-meat, especially the flesh of young
animals and pork. On this subject some illustrations will be found at
the close of the chapter on diseased and decayed animal matter.
It does not appear well ascertained, that the effect of idiosyncrasy is
ever to impair materially the energy of poisons, except in the instances
of mercury, alcohol, and opium.
On the contrary, the tendency of _habit_ when it does affect their
energy, is, with a few exceptions, to lessen it. By the force of habit a
person may take without immediate harm such enormous quantities of some
poisons as would infallibly kill an unpractised person or himself when
he began. There have been opium-eaters in this country who took for days
together ten or even seventeen ounces of laudanum daily.
The influence of habit has been ascertained precisely in the case of a
few common poisons only. On the whole, it would appear that more change
is effected by habit in the action of the organic than in that of the
inorganic poisons; and that of the former, those which act on the brain
and nervous system, and produce _narcotism_, are altered in the most
eminent degree. The best examples of the influence of habit are opium
and vinous spirits. The action of such poisons is not always, however,
entirely thrown away; they still produce some immediate effect; and
farther, by being frequently taken, they may slowly bring on certain
disease, or engender a predisposition to disease. A very singular
exception to this rule prevails in the instance of tobacco; which, under
the influence of habit, may be smoked daily to a considerable amount,
and, so far as yet appears, without any cumulative effect on the
constitution, like that of opium-eating or drinking spirits.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account