_=El dragón de fuego.=_--No better example could be given of the difficulty of determining Benavente's political notions than _El dragón de fuego_. It is at the same time his most serious, most mysterious, and, in the opinion of some critics, his most pessimistic work. The plot is as follows: A certain civilized country called Sirlandia has gained control over the uncivilized people of Nirván, thereby outdistancing the rival powers, Franconia and Suavia (the names may be applied to Western European nations as each reader sees fit). The emissaries of civilization are a general, a merchant, and a clergyman, who symbolize arms, money, and spirituality. The Europeans uphold upon the throne a puppet-king, Dani-Sar, who is the protagonist of the play and whose character is in every respect admirable. His weakness and his strength are those of a man removed from western civilization. Although in love with a maiden, Sita, he surrenders her to his brother Duraní, whom he thinks she loves. Foreigners and natives are alike dear to him, but he falls victim to the selfish and cruel policy of civilization. When the Sirlandians discover that Dani-Sar is not a pliant tool, they dethrone him and make his brother king. Dani-Sar is taken to Sirlandia, where he is held in custody. Outwardly he receives good treatment, but his heart is eaten away by loneliness, despair, and homesickness. He cannot endure the cold climate of the north and the hypocritical hospitality of his captors. In this remarkable play Benavente is well-nigh as inscrutable as the sphinx. He recognizes the power of civilization and the inevitability of its advance. Yet he seems to value even more highly the gentle, noble patriotism of his hero. Other savages he describes as depraved and superstitious, although brave and in love with liberty. The whole composition is a masterly objective treatment of the unavoidable conflict between an advanced and a backward race. =Thesis Plays.=--Those who are familiar only with Benavente's earlier manner can scarcely conceive of him as the author of a problem or thesis drama. A tendency to deny the presence of a thesis may be observed on the part of certain reviewers and critics. But careful reading of the plays and consideration of their chronological development disclose that at one period in his career Benavente's mind was busy with the problems of married life in such a way that he produced something very close to the drama with a purpose. We may trace the beginning of this tendency back to some of the first plays in which a strong woman is introduced as a foil to her worthless companions. Later, _Alma triunfante_ is a glorification of a woman's generosity of soul, and _Por qué se ama_ describes the influence of compassion in causing a woman to cling through thick and thin to the object of her affection.