Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineerDickens Fellowship (London, England)
General
Trial of John Jasper, lay precentor of Cloisterham Cathedral in the County of Kent, for the murder of Edwin Drood, engineer
WITNESS: Yes, she told me she had been to Cloisterham before
on Christmas Eve, and that she had met a youth named Ned, I think it
was, who had also given her money. I took it she had been down on the
same business as that night—following the prisoner.
MR. CHESTERTON: When you had done that, you went to your
score?
WITNESS: When I had done that, I met Deputy, and he told
me that “’Er Royal Highness the Princess Puffer” was staying at the
Travellers’ Tuppeny, and that she kept an opium den in the East End
of London, and then I had very little doubt that that was the place
from which she had followed the prisoner.
MR. CHESTERTON: You told her where she could see the
prisoner next morning?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CHESTERTON: She saw him, and shook her fist at him?
WITNESS: She used dreadful language which is not even in the
Official Records.
MR. CHESTERTON: When she came out, did you say to her, “Have
you seen him?”?
WITNESS: I did.
MR. CHESTERTON: And did she say that she had seen him, and
knew him better than all the Reverend Parsons put together?
WITNESS: Yes.
MR. CHESTERTON: You then went to the cupboard door, and what
did you do?
WITNESS: I made a great score.
MR. CHESTERTON: What was its meaning?
WITNESS: That my interview with, and observations of the
opium woman had settled the three main questions as to which I had
gone down to Cloisterham to decide.
MR. CHESTERTON: Let us take them seriatim. First, how was it
Drood——
WITNESS: From my conversation with her I gathered that
Jasper took opium, and having opium, I had no doubt at all that he
drugged Drood’s wine, and that Drood was so affected as not to be
able to give any clear account as to the event.
MR. CHESTERTON: The second question—How was it that, if
the prisoner was the author of the assault, he had not achieved his
purpose?
WITNESS: My views as to that also were clear. He had been
at the opium den on the night before the Christmas Eve, when she
last visited Cloisterham, and I have no doubt at all that he failed
because he had an opium seizure—such a seizure as Mr. Grewgious saw
him in, and as his nephew Drood saw him in.
MR. CHESTERTON: The third question—How came it, that having
failed to kill Drood, he obviously thought he had done so?
WITNESS: That, I thought, was obvious, because he would have
completed the murder in an opium trance, such a trance as, later,
the “Princess Puffer” described to me, as Jasper having experienced
inside the opium den.
MR. CHESTERTON: We have already heard from the “Princess
Puffer” about its being unreal for the first time. That would fit in
with your theory?
JUDGE: I am afraid the witness must have no theory. As soon
as the examination has put its main point, we must go on.
MR. CHESTERTON (_to witness_): Then, did you get any
confirmation of that view from Mr. Grewgious?
WITNESS: Yes, I wrote to Mr. Grewgious, and he told me of
the seizure on Boxing Day—I think it was Boxing Day—when he had an
interview with Jasper, the prisoner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account