Trial of Pedro de Zulueta, jun., on a Charge of Slave Trading, under 5 Geo. IV, cap. 113, on Friday the 27th, Saturday the 28th, and Monday the 30th of October, 1843, at the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, London: A Full Report from the Short-hand Notes of W. B. Gurney, Esq. — John Shaqi
Trial of Pedro de Zulueta, jun., on a Charge of Slave Trading, under 5 Geo. IV, cap. 113, on Friday the 27th, Saturday the 28th, and Monday the 30th of October, 1843, at the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, London: A Full Report from the Short-hand Notes of W. B. Gurney, Esq.Zulueta, Pedro de
History
Trial of Pedro de Zulueta, jun., on a Charge of Slave Trading, under 5 Geo. IV, cap. 113, on Friday the 27th, Saturday the 28th, and Monday the 30th of October, 1843, at the Central Criminal Court, Old Bailey, London: A Full Report from the Short-hand Notes of W. B. Gurney, Esq.
Zulueta, Pedro de
Slave trade -- Africa; Slave traders -- Africa; Trial transcripts -- England -- London; Zulueta, Pedro de -- Trials, litigation, etc.
right when it was not prohibited, probably do not think it so very bad
if it be committed now, since it has been prohibited by law, only that
it is to be avoided on account of the penalty to which it subjects the
individuals engaged in it. This has some bearing on the question of how
far considerations of character would have weight with respect to such
an offence.” The opinion entertained by the individual in question
against the slave trade may be as strong as the strongest for any thing
that appears, who has stated without its having been contradicted, that
neither himself nor his family have ever been suspected of having the
smallest interest in slave dealing, or in slave property, about which he
has stated how his fathers have proceeded: an individual, who may,
perhaps, have a very strong opinion as to the moral and religious duty
of obedience to positive enactments by competent authority, and who said
something to that effect in the evidence before the Committee of the
House of Commons, which had been read in Court.
This as to the character of the party. As to the inducement, when it is
alleged that the smallness of the agency commission charged shows that
the transaction was considered to be one in the ordinary course of
shipping business, that consideration is pressed down by the weight of
the radical defect in not having given a plain and simple account of
what was intended by the foreign merchant. “It is alleged,” says the
Judge, “that the profit on this transaction would be extremely small. I
do not think that the petty gain of this one transaction is the matter,
for it appears that Pedro Martinez & Co. do a great deal of business,
and it is possible that whenever persons have a large and valuable
business to conduct, _there is some small portion that the correspondent
and agent would willingly get rid of if he could_; but he is not allowed
to pick and choose, but he must take the whole.” In short, a London
merchant, of the character which has been described, is to be supposed
as not at all unlikely to commit a felony, if the alternative be to lose
a valuable connexion.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account