Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II — John Shaqi
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
In this courtroom, Dr. Kogon, a convinced Christian and a deeply
religious man, said: “There was really no other possibility for the men
of the illegal camp administration. I, as a convinced Christian, do not
deny those men the right to have killed people in an emergency who in
collaboration with the SS endangered the lives of individuals or of
many.”
The witness Pieck stated: “It may be that the liquidation of many
political prisoners and of SS spies employed in the camp may make Dr.
Hoven a murderer in the eyes of many; yet, for me and others who
understood the real situation he was a soldier fighting on our side and
risking a great deal.”
Pieck expressed the same opinion also in a letter to the Dutch Ministry
of Justice, a letter that was co-signed by the City Council of Amsterdam
and Mr. Droering, head of a department of the State Institute for War
Documentation in The Hague.
Pieck is one of the few who is best equipped to answer these questions,
for he belonged to the committee of German and foreign political
prisoners which formed itself at Buchenwald.
Father Katjetan, presently Supreme Abbot of one of the largest religious
orders in Czechoslovakia, a former prisoner of the concentration camp
Buchenwald, declared, in the presence of witness Dr. Horn, that those
killings were an inevitable necessity for the preservation of the
inmates who had been abandoned by justice in the camp.
Even the prosecution witness Roemhild had to admit on the stand that it
would have been impossible to save 20,000 prisoners if those spies or
traitors whom Dr. Hoven killed or of whose killing he knew had remained
alive.
Let me ask in this connection: What would have happened if a man of
Kushnir Kushnarev’s caliber had not been killed, and if the murder of
the Russian prisoners of war in the Buchenwald camp had been continued?
Would Dr. Hoven not stand before this Tribunal even then? Then, would
not the same charge be made against Dr. Hoven as the one levelled
against the Japanese Governor of the Philippines who was tried before an
American Military Court for not having prevented atrocities and abuses?
* * * * *
d. Evidence
_Testimony_
Page
Extract from the testimony of defendant Karl Brandt 29
Extracts from the testimony of defense witness Dr. Friedrich 30
Hielscher
Extract from the testimony of prosecution expert witness Dr. 42
Andrew C. Ivy
EXTRACT FROM THE TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT KARL BRANDT[6]
_EXAMINATION_
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account