Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. Sievers, as far as I remember, came to me in the year 1942 and told
me very excitedly that Himmler in his desire to extend the Ahnenerbe
Society had embarked on the thought of including experiments on human
beings in the work of the Ahnenerbe Society. He said that he did not
succeed in frustrating that. He said that he had no desire whatsoever to
participate in these horrible acts and asked me what to do. At that time
we considered this horrible situation very thoroughly and thought of
what we could do. It was quite clear to us what the SS intended here,
and it was questionable whether responsibility could be assumed for any
such acts, whether it would be advisable to be the instrument of Himmler
if he embarked on any such acts, measures where human beings were
degraded to the level of insects.
The following considerations proved to be decisive for us: If Sievers
left, not one person, not one subject in these experiments would be
saved. If Sievers stayed there as a technical secretary, he could throw
sand into that machinery and would, perhaps, be in a position to save
somebody. In addition, the entire plan and the entire overthrow of the
Party stood or fell with Sievers staying at his post. The experiments on
human beings were only part of this horrible Party system, and one had
to concentrate on the decisive points in order finally to remove
everything, and, as I have said before, there was no other way into the
staff of the Reich Leader SS. We therefore concluded that if Sievers
resigned because of that, it was sure that he would be eliminated and
probably all the people he had ever entrusted with a research
assignment, and everything that we had done so far would be lost if he
left, and if anyone was to be saved at all, he could only be saved by
Sievers remaining at his post.
Q. If I have understood you correctly, Sievers at first wanted to resign
from his position as Reich Business Manager of the Ahnenerbe?
A. Yes. That is correct.
Q. Did Sievers approve of these arguments which you and your friends put
forward in favor of his staying with the Reich Leader SS as the Reich
Business Manager of the Ahnenerbe? Did he do it immediately or only
after trying to persuade him for some time?
A. This took a number of days, because Sievers, according to his nature,
was softer than many of us and did not want to agree with us. We finally
had to appeal to his sense of duty and persuade him that he had to do it
and that it was the only way.
Q. Among other matters, it was considered that by Sievers remaining at
his post, there would be a possibility of mitigating these horrible
experiments?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account