Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume IIVarious
Philosophy
Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg military tribunals under control council law no. 10, volume II
Various
Nuremberg Trial of Major German War Criminals, Nuremberg, Germany, 1945-1946; War crime trials -- Germany -- Nuremberg
A. Yes. What particular persons were selected I do not know, of course,
but I knew that a number of Jews were to be gassed and were selected for
this anthropological collection. That was the same case as in the Ghetto
of Lodz. The Jewish commander of the Ghetto—that was Lieutenant
Rosenblatt—after he had gained confidence in me because I had gone in
with a false pass, said personally to me: “I was picked out by the SS.
When a new group of Jews comes into this Ghetto of Lodz and crowds the
Ghetto, I have to select exactly the same number of Jews and I know that
they will be gassed. That is, I was selected by the SS to determine who
is to be gassed. Now, I ask you in the name of God, Mr. Hielscher, you
are a Christian, what am I to do? I had nothing to do with that. I have
asked the Rabbis. I have asked the old people themselves, and we have
come to the conclusion that I must stay in this office. At least I can
determine the persons—I can at least select the oldest people who can’t
stand life in a ghetto and perhaps, in this way, perhaps I will be able
to save the life of one person. These two old people that I am telling
you about were about seventy years old. There were five Christians among
the Jews. At least I was able to see that these two old people were
gassed together. They asked me to tell their daughter that we were able
to achieve at least that. Tell me, did I do right or not?” That is still
more horrible because the man could not even reduce the number. I was
ashamed that the people who were in charge of this camp were called
Germans. But I said: “You have acted right and you are justified in the
eyes of God.”
Q. Now, Dr. Hielscher, I assume that the defense counsel has shown you
all the documents concerning the skeleton collection. Is that right?
A. Yes.
Q. There won’t be any need for me to go over them. You have stated in
connection with the one document that was presented to you today on the
stand that this was a very praiseworthy act on the part of Sievers in a
negative way. Since you are familiar with all the skeleton collection
documents—I had intended to go into each one but I will just go into
that one. That is Document NO-088, Prosecution Exhibit 182. This is a
document which was written by Sievers. You will see that his signature
appears thereon. Do you recognize the signature at the bottom of the
letter?
A. Yes.
Q. Well, Sievers here is proposing a way in which they can destroy the
skeleton collection so that it will not be known to any one—that is, to
the Allies when they overrun Strasbourg. And you will notice, two-thirds
of the way through, the one paragraph that states: “The viscera could be
declared as remnants of corpses apparently left in the anatomical
institute by the French.” You see that?
A. Yes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account