The heading and bench method of excavating rock tunnels is not always
followed in the manner just described but is employed with slight
modifications. There is a large variety of modifications but only the
two most commonly used in practical works are given here. The heading
and bench method illustrated in Fig. 66 was used, among others, on the
Gallitsin tunnel along the Pennsylvania R.R. at the summit of the
Alleghenies near Altoona, Pa., and more recently in the tunnels
constructed by the same company under Bergen Hill, N. J., for the
entrance to New York City. The shape of the cross-section of these
tunnels was semicircular arch on vertical side walls. The excavation was
made in three consecutive cuts, viz., the heading marked 1 in the
figure, the top bench 2, and the lower bench 3. A heading 7 ft. high and
10 ft. wide was attached near the crown of the arch and the rock was
removed by means of a center cut and parallel side holes, the number of
holes depending upon the consistency of the rock. The part No. 2 was
excavated by drilling holes at each side to different depths and at
different inclinations in order to reach the line of the profile as well
as the springing line of the proposed tunnel. The central part of the
top bench was excavated by means of holes driven vertically from the
floor of the heading. The bottom bench No. 3, included between the
springing line of the arch and subgrade, was removed by means of five
vertical holes driven from the floor of the top bench. The three
different working parts were kept nearly 10 ft. apart. Blasting was
effected in reversed order to the figures marked in the diagram, viz.,
the bottom bench first and the heading last.
[Illustration: FIG. 67.--Diagram Showing a Modification of the Heading
and Bench Method.]
Still another modification of the heading and bench method, commonly
followed by American engineers, is the one shown in Fig. 67. This
consists in dividing the tunnel section in three parts by horizontal
lines. The resultant parts are first the heading excavated close to the
roof, and as wide as the whole section of the tunnel; second, the top
bench in the middle, and lastly the bottom bench excavated to the depth
of the proposed tunnel floor. The excavation proceeds in the numerical
order, beginning at the heading which was excavated, as usual, by means
of a center cut and side holes to the full width of the proposed tunnel.
First the top bench, then the bottom bench, are removed by means of
vertical holes driven from the floor of the heading and the floor of the
top bench, respectively.
COMPARISON OF METHODS.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account