While the engineer did not consider the difficulty of proceeding along
the old line insurmountable, it was decided to be less difficult on the
whole to go back from 150 ft. to 175 ft. and deflect the line to the
north and upward, so as to pass over the underground entrance. Instead
of allowing the water to flow at its normal rate and take care of it by
pumping, the contractors desired to reduce the pumping, and to this end
they constructed a bulkhead just west of the deflection toward the south
with a view of shutting off the water. The water, however, accumulated
with a pressure of some 50 lbs. per sq. in. and penetrated the filling
around the brick lining of the tunnel, preventing the cutting through of
the lining for the new line. A second bulkhead was then built about 20
ft. west of the first, but with not much better results, for upon
closing it the water was found to leak through the brickwork for a long
distance west. Finally on Aug. 2, 1892, the contractors lifted their
pumps and allowed the tunnel to fill again with water.
No further work was done on the tunnel by the contractors, although they
continued work on the lake shaft for some months. Difficulties had,
however, arisen here, which will be described further on; and finally a
disagreement arose between the contractors and the city over the delay
in prosecuting the tunnel work and over one or two other questions,
which resulted in the City Council suspending their contract and
ordering the Board of Public Works to go ahead with the work.
The first step to be taken by the engineer was to purchase adequate
pumping machinery and empty the tunnel. This was effected Jan. 17, 1894;
and as soon as practicable thereafter the two bulkheads were removed and
the tunnel cleaned, tram-car tracks laid, and everything prepared for
work. It was now determined to go ahead on the original line of the
tunnel if possible, and the bulkhead here was removed and work begun.
Meanwhile, a safety bulkhead had been built to replace the first one
torn away. This was provided with a door and drainage pipes. Work was
begun on the original heading, but had proceeded only a little way when
the water broke in, driving out the workmen. This was removed three or
four times, when the flow suddenly increased to 3000 gallons per minute.
An examination of the lake bottom above the break showed that it had
settled down, indicating that the new break connected with the lake
bottom, and making further work along the original line out of the
question.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account