There was only one London newspaper, the _St. James’s Gazette_, which
came out frankly in favor of British participation in the Bagdad
Railway. In the issue of April 14, 1903, the editor ridiculed the
suggestion of the _Spectator_ that the Foreign Office was obliged to
warn bankers of the financial risks involved in the enterprise. “Why
our contemporary should be so anxious to save financiers, British
or foreign, from making a bad investment of their money, we cannot
imagine. Financiers are generally pretty wide-awake, and the City as
a rule requires no advice from Fleet Street, the Strand, or Whitehall
in transacting its business.” In an editorial entitled “Bagdad and Bag
Everything,” April 22, 1903, the _Gazette_ condemned _The Times_ for
the “curious and alarmist deductions” which that journal drew from
the terms of the Bagdad Railway convention. The suggestion that this
was a deliberate attempt on the part of Germany to ruin British trade
was characterized “as much a figment of a fevered imagination as the
mind-picture of Turkey using ‘this enormous line to pour down troops
to reduce the shores of the Persian Gulf to the same happy condition
as Armenia and Macedonia,’ about which _The Times_ is so suddenly and
unaccountably concerned. The concession is a monument to the German
Emperor’s activity, built on the ruins of the influence which we threw
away, and we do not precisely see what our _locus standi_ in the matter
is. If the interests of the Ottoman Government and of the German
concessionaires be served by the construction of the line, constructed
the line will be, and there’s an end. Whether it ever will, or ever can
pay its way, is the affair only of capitalists who are contemplating
investment in it. It is not the slightest use barking when we cannot
bite, and our power of biting in the present instance is excessively
small.... The Emperor William, like Jack Jones, has ‘come into ’is
little bit of splosh’ in Asia Minor, and it is quite useless to be
soreheaded about it. It is childish to be ever carping and nagging and
‘panicking.’ We question whether the Bagdad Railway—while the rule of
the Sultan endures—is going to do much good or much harm to anybody.
The vision which some Germans have of peaceful Hans and Gretchen
swilling Löwenbrau in the Garden of Eden to the strains of a German
band, is little likely of fulfilment. If trade develops, a fair share
of it will come our way, provided we send good wares and such as the
inhabitants want to buy.” This minority opinion, however, was unheeded
in the outburst of anti-German feeling which followed Mr. Balfour’s
first statement to the House of Commons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account