Two English queens and PhilipHume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Philosophy
Two English queens and Philip
Hume, Martin A. S. (Martin Andrew Sharp)
Before this happened, Philip’s Council in Madrid had exhaustively
discussed Alba’s recommendation that the murder of Elizabeth should
precede the sending of Spanish forces to England. They not only approved
fully of it, but laid down that the act should be committed, not in
London, but whilst the Queen was on a progress. Much sanctimonious talk
there was in the Council about the sacredness of the cause excusing the
means, and even the Pope’s Nuncio smiled upon the nefarious plan and
called it righteous. As for Philip himself, he was perfectly willing,
and said that the whole thing now turned upon the ability to get the
money together for the purpose, “and it would be a great pity to miss so
important a matter or so small an amount, as later it would cost so much
more.”[201] It is probably true, as was urged for them, that neither Mary
nor Norfolk consented in so many words to this openly avowed condition of
the Spaniards to make the prior murder of Elizabeth a condition of armed
aid being sent from Flanders. The proposal was certainly not contained
in the instructions carried by Ridolfi from Norfolk, though it is, in
my opinion, indicated in the letter from de Spes to Zayas of 25th March
quoted on an earlier page. It is first put clearly in black and white by
Alba himself, and warmly adopted by Philip and his Council. But though
Mary and Norfolk were not therefore necessarily parties to the proposed
crime, there can be no doubt in the mind of any reasonable person what
would have befallen Elizabeth if success had attended the attempt, and
Norfolk had carried out the pledge he gave to Alba to seize the Tower of
London and secure the person of the Queen.
We have here, however, not to deal with the culpability of the English
actors so much as with that of the Catholic King, so full of saintly
professions and so devoutly pious himself, who in his helplessness
and desperation was willing at last, in order to extricate himself
from a political impasse, to consent to treason and murder as a means
to righteousness. In the letter Philip wrote to de Spes (4th August,
1571)—in ignorance, of course, of the collapse of the plot—he conveys
his intention to patronise the murder of Elizabeth in the following
characteristic words: “After carrying the whole question before
Almighty God, whose cause it is, and in whom we trust for the guidance
and direction of the affair better than human prudence can effect or
understand, since the object is entirely, purely, and simply directed
to His glory and service and the exaltation of His holy faith, I have
resolved to adopt the course which you will learn from the Duke of Alba,
to whom I write about it at great length. In conformity therewith and
the orders he will give to you, you will act in the business with the
discretion, dexterity, suavity and prudence which we expect of you,
keeping in close communication with the Duke (of Alba) and carrying out
his orders explicitly.”[202]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account