U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul OperationMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Even success did not alter the conviction of Navy and Marine amphibious
specialists that risks had been assumed in the Inchon landing which
might have resulted in disaster. It was taking no credit away from
General MacArthur for his unshakeable faith in victory to conclude
that fortune had smiled in some instances when a frown would have been
costly.
The teamwork of Marine supporting arms was never shown to better effect
than in the establishment of a bridgehead over the Han. Lieutenant
Colonel Partridge’s engineers, of course, were on the job from the
beginning. It was up to them to get the tanks across the river as
soon as possible, in case the infantry needed the support of armor.
Approaches and ferry landings had to be constructed for this purpose;
and just six hours after the initial infantry crossing, the engineers
had their first six-float M4A2 raft in operation. It had taken them
four hours to build.[306]
[306] 1st MarDiv _SAR_, Annex Nan Nan; Partridge interv, 23
Nov 54.
The 2d Platoon of Able Company, 1st Tank Battalion, crossed the river
at 1410 on 20 September and moved up in support of 3/5. The 1st Platoon
followed at 1600 and the 3d Platoon late that afternoon, after the
engineers completed a second raft.
When the KMCs attempted to cross in DUKWs, the clumsy vehicles bogged
down several yards from the river on the south bank. Partridge
suggested to the KMC commander that his troops build a makeshift
corduroy approach off the main route which Marine engineers were
constructing to the embarkation point. The Korean officer agreed with
Partridge that this was a sensible solution and soon had his men
gathering logs.
Neither of them dreamed that they had stirred up an international
incident which called for a decision on the division level. American
policy makers had felt it necessary to lean backwards to avoid giving
Communist propagandists any excuse to charge us with recruiting Koreans
for “slave labor.” It was an extremely sensitive subject, and Partridge
was astonished at the repercussions. At last General Craig visited
the ferry site and ruled that it was a closed incident after finding
all explanations satisfactory. It was further decided--for mechanical
rather than political reasons--to take the KMCs across in amtracs
rather than waste any more time on DUKWs.[307]
[307] Partridge interv, 23 Nov 54.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account