U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul OperationMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
On the night of the 20th, Partridge and Colonel McAlister, the Division
G-4, interviewed a captured NKPA engineer major at Kimpo Airfield.
The prisoner informed them that the bombed highway bridge between
Yongdungpo and Seoul had been damaged beyond repair with the means at
hand. This agreed with the conclusions of the Marine officers on the
basis of aerial observation. Prospects for a span over the Han seemed
dim as Partridge was leaving McAlister’s quarters. That very evening,
however, Lieutenant Colonel Rowny, chief of the X Corps engineers,
telephoned to announce that materials for a floating bridge unit had
been accumulated by the Army in Japan and would be flown to Korea
shortly. Up to this time, with rafts the only solution, the Marine
engineers had supplied all the materials. But Rowny announced that
Corps would assume the responsibility after the arrival of enough
materials for a floating bridge unit.[308]
[308] _Ibid._
Military operations could not wait a week or ten days for the new span,
and the Marine ferry plus amtracs and DUKWs[309] had to nourish the
assault on Seoul. With this end in view, the 1st Shore Party Battalion
reverted to Division control on the 19th and displaced from Inchon to
Oeoso-ri. By nightfall the entire battalion was bivouacked in this area.
[309] MajGen E. W. Snedeker ltr to authors, 29 Apr 55.
On the 20th, after establishing a forward CP at Kimpo Airfield, the
shore party troops of Baker Company moved up to the Han in support of
the 5th Marines, followed by two teams from Able Company. Evacuation
stations and supply dumps were set up on both banks. Other shore party
missions were maintaining LVT and DUKW traffic control, providing
guides for the amtracs, posting security at the crossing sites on both
banks, and effecting unit distribution of supplies upon request by the
DUKWs and LVTs.
Control of the ferry site, known as BAKER Ferry, became the
responsibility of Baker Company of the 1st Shore Party Battalion. Teams
1 and 2 were employed on the south bank, and Team 3 plus headquarters
troops on the other shore. Traffic control was of the utmost
importance, since ferry operation had to be limited to periods of low
tide, and during idle intervals a long line of vehicles accumulated.
Most of them were trucks containing cargo to be reloaded in LVTs and
taken across the river. The shore party men had the duty of keeping the
traffic flowing as smoothly as possible, both on land and water, and
special regulations were enforced to prevent the LVTs from colliding
with the ferries. With the establishment of a third ferry, the problem
of supplying the troops across the river was pretty well solved.[310]
[310] 1st Mar Div _SAR_, Annex Mike Mike.
_Command Ashore Assumed by X Corps_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account