U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul OperationMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
This was brought home forcibly to the Marine general on the morning of
the 23d, when he attended a meeting conducted by Major General Clark L.
Ruffner, Chief of Staff of the future X Corps. Although the conference
proceeded according to the usual form, General Smith felt that it
departed at times from the realism which he considered an essential of
sound amphibious planning. It was announced, for instance, that after
taking Inchon, the 1st Marine Division was to cross the Han and attack
Seoul, although X Corps had neither equipment nor materiel for bridging
the sizeable river.[64]
[64] O. P. Smith, _Chronicle_, 23 Aug 50.
A review of the background disclosed that after CinCFE decided on 10
July not to use the 1st Cavalry Division as his landing force, he
briefly considered two other Army outfits. The 2d Infantry Division,
commanded by Major General Lawrence B. Keiser, was then under orders
to embark from the West Coast. Some of the personnel had been given
amphibious training by an ANGLICO instruction team and had taken part
in Operation MIKI, but the division as a whole was much understrength.
The same difficulty led to the elimination of Major General David G.
Barr’s 7th Infantry Division in Japan, which had supplied troops to
units at the front until only a cadre remained.
The assurance on 25 July of a war-strength Marine division took care
of the _who_ question. Next came the problems of _when_ and _where_
an amphibious assault could be best mounted. JANIS (Joint Army and
Navy Intelligence Studies) reports indicated that the east coast of
Korea, though of lesser importance in military respects, offered such
hydrographic advantages as unusually moderate tides and a general
absence of shoals. In forbidding contrast, the shallow west coast
waters could be navigated at most points only by means of narrow
channels winding through the mud flats.[65]
[65] JANIS No. 75, ch. IV, _Theater Study, Korean Coast and
Beaches_.
Of all the west coast seaports, Inchon was probably the least desirable
objective when considered strictly from the viewpoint of hydrographic
conditions. From first to last, however, Inchon was Douglas MacArthur’s
choice. FECOM staff officers ventured to suggest two alternatives,
Wonsan on the east coast and Kunsan on the west coast, but the
commander in chief replied that neither was close enough to the enemy’s
main line of communications to suit his purposes. He would settle for
nothing less than Inchon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account