U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation — John Shaqi
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul OperationMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 2 (of 5): The Inchon-Seoul Operation
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
And even this ambitious undertaking was not the whole show. For a
joint operation was to be carried out meanwhile by Eighth Army forces
thrusting northward from the Pusan Perimeter to form a junction with
the units of the Inchon-Seoul drive. This double-barreled assault, it
was believed, would shatter North Korean resistance and put an end to
the war.
_Inception of X Corps_
The time, the place, the landing force, the main objectives--these
essentials of the proposed Inchon-Seoul operation had been pretty well
settled, at least to General MacArthur’s satisfaction, by the first
week of August. But even though he had his assault troops, there was as
yet no headquarters organization.
Admiral Sherman urged early in August that the commander in chief call
upon General Shepherd and the facilities of the FMFPac organization at
Pearl Harbor. Since there was so little time left before D-day--only a
fraction of the time usually allotted to the planning phase of a major
ship to shore assault--he felt that amphibious know-how and experience
were required. He proposed, therefore, that steps be taken to obtain
the approval of Admiral Radford, who had jurisdiction over FMFPac.
The need for a headquarters organization was discussed on 7 August
by the Joint Strategic Plans and Operations Group (JSPOG) of FECOM.
Brigadier General Wright, G-3 of FECOM, received a memorandum from the
other members of the staff recommending that the gap be filled in one
of two ways--either by putting into effect Admiral Sherman’s plan, or
by sponsoring the organization of a provisional corps headquarters.
General Wright favored the first course of action, as did Brigadier
General Doyle G. Hickey, FECOM deputy chief of staff. Ultimately,
however, the FECOM chief of staff decided in favor of the latter
command arrangement.[68]
[68] OCMH, Dept of Army (Maj J. F. Schnabel), _The Korean
Conflict_ (MS), v. I, ch. I.
_Final Conference on Inchon_
The questions of _when_ and _where_ and _who_ had been answered to some
extent. But as late as 23 August, a good many variations of opinion
existed as to _how_ the amphibious assault was to be accomplished.
The natural obstacles of the Inchon harbor area were so disturbing
that Doyle suggested an alternative to MacArthur and Almond. Since
the purpose of the landing was to drive inland and cut the enemy’s
communications, urged ComPhibGru One, why not select a west coast
objective with fewer hydrographic difficulties? He proposed the
Posung-Myon area, about 30 miles south of Inchon on the west coast,
where better approach channels and beaches were believed to be
available in a more lightly populated locality. A landing at this
point, Doyle contended, would not be attended by the risks and
restrictions of Inchon, yet after securing a beachhead the troops would
be in position to strike inland at the enemy’s main line of rail and
highway communications in the vicinity of Osan.[69]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account