U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central FrontMontross, Lynn
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 4 (of 5): The East-Central Front
Montross, Lynn
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
If ever a bronze plaque is awarded in commemoration of the first
history-making helicopter troop and supply lifts, it would be fitting
to install it on Hill 884. That bleak and roadless height had its fifth
large-scale operation on 24 February when Lieutenant Colonel Harold
C. Howard’s 1st Battalion, 7th Marines, relieved the 2d Battalion,
of that same regiment on “Mount Helicopter.” Operation ROTATE was
completed without incident as further evidence that battalion reliefs
by helicopter were now routine.
In spite of the demands made upon HMR-161 helicopters in cold weather
and mountainous terrain, it is noteworthy that no serious mechanical
defects had developed. This six-month record came to an end on 24
February 1952 when Captain John R. Irwin was returning from Seoul to
X-83. Warned by alarming vibrations, he landed to discover that the
broken remnants of the tail assembly had dropped behind him in the snow.
Four days later, while flying a load of logs for bunkers, Captain
Calvin G. Alston’s aircraft was so shaken by vibrations that he
suspected damage from enemy artillery fragments. He made a forced
landing in the snow only to discover another instance of a tail
assembly breakdown.
Colonel McCutcheon grounded all HMR-161 aircraft until the trouble
could be corrected. Not until 14 March, after 16 modified tail
assemblies had been flown to Korea did the Marine transport helicopter
squadron take to the air again.
_The Five Days of Operation_ CLAM-UP
Ground operations continued with little change during February and
the first two weeks of March. The only departure from the well-worn
tactical norm came on 10 February, when EUSAK put Operation CLAM-UP
into effect across the entire UN front.
The purpose was to feign a withdrawal and lure the enemy into sending
out patrols which would yield prisoners to Eighth Army units. A EUSAK
letter of instruction, dated 4 February 1952, asserted that “a policy
of aggressive patrolling has led the enemy to rely upon our patrols
for the maintenance of contact. This situation enables him to maintain
contact without subjecting his troops to the hazard of capture or
casualty.”[352]
[352] This section, unless otherwise specified, is based upon
the 1stMarDiv _HD_, Feb 52, 1–12; and _PacFlt Interim
Rpt_ No. 4, 9–11 to 9–14.
All corps were directed to “... attempt to decoy the enemy into
dispatching patrols against our lines and ambush and capture such
patrols.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account