U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
[338] The 1st Commonwealth Division, to the Marine right,
utilized a different defense system. Instead of relying
on the COPs forward of the main line of defense as major
deterrent positions, the British preferred to include all
strategic terrain features within the MLR itself. They
followed a policy of active patrolling to the front and,
at night, occupied selected ground sites, preferring to
fight the enemy from their main battle positions rather
than from more isolated COP positions. _PactFlt EvalRpt_
No. 6, Chap. 9, pp. 9-92, 9-93.
[339] The military crest is that point along the slope of a
hill from which maximum observation up and down the hill
can be obtained. The topographical crest is the highest
point on a hill or ridge.
[Illustration:
MAP DIAGRAM 20 K. White
ORGANIZATION OF GROUND DEFENSE
WINTER 1952–1953]
Altered defense concepts, beginning in October, took the following form:
(1) The trace of defensive positions followed the topographical
crest (A) rather than military crest (B) of key terrain features.
(Map diagrams 20 and 21 illustrate these changes.)
(2) Fighting positions and emplacements were dug a short distance
downslope (C) from the topographical crest.
(3) Trenches on the topographical crest permitted easier, faster,
and more protected access to fighting positions from the reverse
slope and support area (D).
(4) Positions on the topographical crest were less vulnerable to
enemy artillery because it was more difficult for the enemy to
adjust his fire on these positions than on trenches dug along the
military crest. Many shells simply passed over the top (E) of the
hill.
(5) Certain hills and noses were selected and organized so that
trenches and gun emplacements, encircling the crest, would form
mutually supporting positions (X).
(6) Machine guns were moved from the draws (Y) to hilltops and
noses (Z) where better long-range observation and fields of fire
existed.
[Illustration:
MAP DIAGRAM 21 K. WHITE
TYPICAL HILL DEFENSE
(Cross Section)
WINTER 1952–1953]
Another change in the improvement of field fortifications came into use
during the winter months. A different type of barbed wire obstacle,
called “Canadian,” “random,” or “double-apron” wire, began to find
favor with Marine infantrymen. Canadian wire consisted of two parallel
rows of three-strand barbed wire fencing, erected about three feet
apart. The void was filled in with additional barbed wire, placed
at random, but connected to the parallel fences.[340] The new type
barbed wire appeared more effective for several reasons. Besides being
simple and fast to emplace, Canadian wire merely became more entangled
by artillery shelling, which quickly ripped apart the standard
double-apron barbed wire previously used in COP slope defenses.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account