U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
A week of experimentation and trial runs to perfect the night close
air support (NCAS) was conducted by several VMF(N)-513 pilots under
direction of Colonel Jack R. Cram. Formerly CO of Marine Air Control
Group Two at K-3, he had extended his tour in Korea to complete work
on the new program. On 12 April, the first night of operations, Major
Charles L. Schroeder and Second Lieutenant Thomas F. St. Denis flew two
night support missions in F7F Tigercats. Although employed only a few
weeks prior to the division going into reserve on 5 May, the new system
rated an enthusiastic response from both pilots and ground commanders,
all the way up to the division CG. As the latter reported to the
Commandant following the first week of night close support missions,
“results ... exceeded all expectations.”[440]
[440] CG, 1stMarDiv msg to CMC, dtd 18 Apr 53; in 1stMarDiv
ComdD, Apr 53, App. II, p. 2.
Between 12 April and 5 May, the night fighter squadron conducted 58
NCAS sorties in the division right sector employing this new control
system with excellent results.[441] The procedure was a marked success
and made it possible to provide continuous 24-hour-a-day close support
to Marine infantry units. It was considered a supplement to, not a
replacement for the MPQ (radar controlled bombing) missions of MASRT-1.
Plans called for F9F aircraft to be integrated into the program, since
the F7F Tigercats were being replaced by jets. Allied psychological
warfare teams on 17 April introduced a different theme in their
broadcasts to the enemy: that of the dangers to the CCF from the new
searchlight marking of targets. As a Marine training bulletin noted:
“It is believed that this method of attack by aircraft is particularly
demoralizing to the enemy because he is unable to anticipate where
the strike will hit, and therefore has no means of defending himself
against it.”[442]
[441] Confirmed damage assessment in this period: 75 enemy
KIA, 5 WIA; 25 bunkers, 12 personnel shelters, 20 mortar
positions, 32 automatic weapons positions, 1 ammunition
bunker, and 1 37mm AA position destroyed; 1 supply area,
3 weapons damaged; 1,545 yards trenchline destroyed;
and 190 secondary explosions or fires. Due to operating
conditions, these figures represented only 80 percent of
the total flights made on which TAOs confirmed results.
VMF(N)-513 ComdDs, Apr-May 53.
[442] _PacFlt EvalRpt_ No. 6, Chap. 9, p. 9-106, quoting
1stMarDiv Training Bulletin No. 5-53, dtd 10 Jun 53.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account