Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors — John Shaqi
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
Yet it is very significant that Kotlyarevsky in his first Ukrainian
work did not produce anything along these lines. Neither did his
interest in the people and their speech lead him to make a scientific
study of the language of the people. In this he differs sharply
from the Czech scholar Dobrovsky and he differs equally sharply
from Lomonosov and the other writers who founded modern Russian
literature. Poland too had its own development on the basis of French
pseudo-classicism which later passed into the Romantic period.
Kotlyarevsky started on the basis of the old classical culture of the
Ukrainian schools and stood nearer to the enlightened sceptics of the
eighteenth century than to the younger group of Romantic authors.
There is a story that he had commenced the _Eneida_ during his studies
at the Poltava seminary and had worked over it for many years. It is
perhaps possible, for there is much in it that reminds us of a work
conceived in a school perhaps as a definite and humorous reaction to
the excessive Latin training that was customary at the time.
It was a bold idea to undertake a travestying of the _Aeneid_ but it
was something that might be done under the conditions prevailing, as
other authors of Russia had done. The use of the vernacular was only a
slight extension of the normal usage for a burlesque epic should not,
under the strict rules, have been written in the high style and we can
therefore understand the course of Kotlyarevsky’s reasoning in starting
upon this work.
The most significant fact is that the author definitely decided to
depict Aeneas and his companions as Ukrainian Kozaks wandering around
Europe in search of a new home. The comparison was obvious but it took
a mind of considerable penetration to grasp the situation. Then as
now the vast majority of classical students insisted upon seeing the
ancients in a vacuum which had no relation to present reality. On the
other hand in the very first paragraph Kotlyarevsky sets the key note.
Aeneas was a clever fellow
And he was a superb Kozak.
He stood all ills and did not bellow,
Surpassed his men on every tack.
But when the Greeks old Troy had fired
And made of it what they desired,
He took his pack and drew a sigh.
A group of Trojans he did rally,
All banished boys, to make a sally
And showed his heels to Troy for aye.
The very opening stanza could not fail to bring to the mind of every
Ukrainian the parallel between Aeneas and the Kozaks from the ruined
Sich and with that as his text Kotlyarevsky worked on, following the
Aeneid very closely and yet modifying the adventures of the Roman hero
so that they would fit perfectly into the position of the Kozaks. His
skill in selecting the proper details and episodes show his amazing
talent in this difficult task.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account