Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
In Polish we find the _Maria_ of Malczewski and in Russian we
have Gogol’s _Evenings on a Farm near Dikanka_ and the collection
of _Mirgorod_ with the great story of _Taras Bulba_, a brilliant
description of Kozak life as Gogol conceived it. Yet Gogol had an
attitude of unbending loyalty to the Russian Tsars. He knew relatively
little of Ukrainian history, although he was proud of the fact that his
family had been famous in the Sich and his father had written several
plays in Ukrainian after the tradition of Kotlyarevsky.
It was necessary to widen the range of the Ukrainian subject matter
and to create new forms of writing but this was no easy task under the
conditions of the day. As at Poltava, so at Kharkiv there was a great
interest in things Ukrainian, especially after the foundation of the
university there in 1805 but there was a general aristocratic tone to
the entire social life and the same tradition that Kotlyarevsky had
opposed at Poltava.
Despite these handicaps certain steps in the development of the
literature were taken by Hrihori Kvitka, a landowner of the
neighborhood of Kharkiv. He was born in 1778 and received the usual
superficial education of the day and of his class. He had little
regular instruction and that little was entirely in Russian. Largely
through the influence of Skovoroda, he became deeply religious at the
age of twelve and wanted to enter a monastery. His parents prevented it
and they finally put him in the Russian army. In a short time he left
it and entered the civil service. Then he tried the army again and when
he was twenty he entered a monastery as a lay brother. This life too
proved uncongenial and finally he left it and returned home to busy
himself with the social life of the day and to dabble in intellectual
pursuits. Of course he read the _Eneida_ but it did not inspire him to
imitate it or to use the Ukrainian language.
Instead of that, he began to write in Russian under the pen name of
Falaley Povinukhin. His stories attracted a certain amount of attention
in Kharkiv but they made no impression on the literary world of the
two capitals. They were merely stories written by a provincial Russian
for a provincial audience. Kvitka would have remained unknown and
unnoticed, had chance not led him to try his native Ukrainian.
He was joking one day with a writer who was endeavoring to compose
in his native tongue and Kvitka asked him to write something serious
and sentimental in it. When the author replied that the language was
unfit for such subjects, Kvitka became displeased and to prove his
friend wrong, he decided to write himself some stories in Ukrainian
and soon he turned out two of his main works, _The Soldier’s Portrait_
and _Marusia_. Their success was immediate in Ukrainian circles and it
was not long before they were translated into Russian and brought the
author that fame which he had never achieved in his Russian writings.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors — John Shaqi
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account