Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
Before this in 1812 he had become the director of the theatre in
Kharkiv and this inspired him to write dramas and especially comedies.
In 1831, he gave up most of his interests in Kharkiv and retired to his
estate at his native village of Osnova, from which he took the pen name
for his Ukrainian writings, Osnovyanenko. From that time he came to the
city only once a year to carry out his duties as Marshal of the local
nobility. Thus absorbed in society and his estates, he died in 1843 at
a ripe old age.
It is curious that in his later days the very success which he had won
for the Russian translations of his Ukrainian works, many of which he
had made himself, led him back to Russian and he again tried without
success to achieve fame in that language, while he prepared Ukrainian
translations of his Russian books. The result was a weakening of the
value of his works, for it can be truthfully said that Kvitka wrote
nothing of importance except in Ukrainian.
To a large extent Kvitka was typical of the vegetable existence of the
nobles of the day. The timeless life on the big estates gave to the
masters abundant and placid happiness and isolated them from the life
that was proceeding at an ever increasing tempo in both Ukraine and
Russia. Kvitka maintained the old conservative attitude toward life and
was always the talented amateur and the respectable reactionary in his
views. Thus in his _Letters to my dear Countrymen_ which appeared in
the thirties, he definitely set forth a type of reactionary doctrine
which had long since been repudiated by the great writers of the same
period in Moscow and St. Petersburg. He unhesitatingly declares “As
God is heaven, so is he (the tsar) on earth” and he explains to his
countrymen of the government of Kharkiv the glories and the virtue and
the divine origin of the imperial regime. Radical critics attacked him
for his views but we must never forget that throughout his entire life
he was a provincial nobleman who accepted uncritically the slogans of
the day as they were accepted in the Russianized circles of Kharkiv
society.
If these _Letters_ could be taken as the whole of Kvitka’s work, he
would hardly deserve mention but it was only a small part of his
activity. _The Little Russian Tales_ published in Moscow in 1834-37 and
in Kharkiv in 1841 were very different.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account