Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors — John Shaqi
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
After giving such rich and varied pictures of Ukrainian life, it
is strange that he returned to Russian and in such stories as _Pan
Halyavsky_, he describes in a fairly amusing manner the life of a
typical rich cub with his stupid Polish tutors and his inability
to accomplish anything. In great detail the author shows how he is
tyrannized over by his ambitious wife who succeeds in sending him to
the country, so that she can play around with the army officers who
seem to her more attractive. Perhaps in a way Kvitka is not so untrue
to his own feelings, for he draws a sharp differentiation between the
native life of the villages and the gay existence of the capital.
Kvitka then stands in a curious position in Ukrainian literature. He
undoubtedly deserves the praise which was showered upon him for his
ability in describing Ukrainian peasant life in excellent and readable
prose. He marks a definite advance over Kotlyarevsky in the greater
range of emotions and themes which he handles and in the more serious
moods that appear at times. Yet it was not in him to be a champion of
the cause of his people. It was not in him to break definitely with the
polished world of the great estates and to start a definite movement
for the assistance of the peasants. He recognized the dubious position
of Ukraine in its contacts with the Russians but at the same time he
appreciated the advantages which the connection with Russia had given
him and his aristocratic friends and he was constantly torn between the
two ideals.
Kvitka was really a passing phase in the development of Ukrainian
literature. In many ways he can be compared to Gogol who had definitely
stepped across the line into Russian. Kvitka was held back by his
success in his Ukrainian stories. He knew the village life around
him and felt that it was only from that life that he could draw his
best themes. Yet he did not analyze or think through his position.
He remained within the framework and lived the life of the average
Russianized Ukrainian nobleman and hence it was, as he swayed back
and forth, that he was condemned by Shevchenko and the ardent young
patriots of the next generation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account